Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441345›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Prior Robotic Console Expertise May Improve Basic Skills at the New Hugo RAS Simulator: Results from a Cohort Trial and Implications for Skill Transference Across Platforms.

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Stefano Terzoni, Elena Scanferla, Pietro Paolo Bianchi, Giampaolo Formisano, Gaetano Piccolo, Matteo Barabino, Andrea Pisani, Adelona Salaj, Giorgia Gaia and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Chiara SighinolfiUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefano TerzoniSan Paolo Bachelor School of Nursing, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Elena ScanferlaUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Pietro Paolo BianchiUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giampaolo FormisanoUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano PiccoloUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BarabinoUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Andrea PisaniUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Adelona SalajUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giorgia GaiaUnit of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria MarconiUnit of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Filippo TurriUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Mattia SangalliUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CentanniASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Matteo StoccoASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Davide ChiumelloUnit of Anesthesiology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Simone AssummaUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca SarchiUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso CalcagnileUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Enrico PanioUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Angelica GrassoUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Dell'OrtoUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Nicolo Maria MarianiUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Clemente VerrusioUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro BaisiUnit of Thoracic Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BozziniUnit of Urology, ASST Lariana, Como, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, La Statale University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted surgery ensures minimal invasiveness; since the expiry of the Da Vinci patent, new robotic systems have entered the market. Recently, the Hugo RAS received CE approval for several surgical procedures. However, more is needed to know about skill acquisition at the new simulator. Objective: This study aims to analyse the factors impacting basic surgical skills at the Hugo RAS simulator. Design setting and participants: We present a cross-sectional study involving 71 participants of different backgrounds invited to a hands-on session with the Hugo RAS simulator voluntarily. All of them had no prior expertise with the system. Participants were recruited among medical/nurse students, residents, and laparoscopic and robotic surgeons. Intervention: All participants underwent a hands-on "pick and place" exercise at the Hugo RAS simulator; the metrics of a second-round pick and place exercise were recorded. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Metrics were analysed with regard to the following variables: demographics, videogame use, and prior surgical experience (no surgical expertise, experience with laparoscopy, and experience with robotic console). Results and limitations: All participants completed the test. Of them, 77.5% were naïve to surgery, 8.5% had prior laparoscopic expertise, and 14.1% had prior robotic console experience. The time to complete the pick and place exercise was significantly lower ( Conclusions: This is the first study analysing factors impacting basic skill acquisition at a new robotic simulator. Experience with robotic consoles may represent a major factor, raising the hypothesis of the transferability of basic robotic skills across different robotic systems. Further studies are required to explore this issue. Patient summary: In the present study, we analysed which characteristics may affect the basic surgical skills at a novel robotic platform.

Indexed as

Basic robotic skill acquisitionHugo RASRoboticSimulator

Identifiers

PMID37441345
PMCPMC10334229
OpenAlexW4379179338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.