ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Role of qualitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant breast lesions.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- An observational study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing malignant breast masses.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of quantitative ultrasonography parameters combined with serum cancer antigen 15‑3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and soluble E‑cadherin in diagnosing mass‑type breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carcinoma breast is the commonest cancer among women. Various authors have studied breast cancer with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) with promising results. Despite promising results, the additional cost of post-processing software limits its availability. In this study, we evaluated the utility of CEUS in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions on regular ultrasound equipment without the use of dedicated software. Methods: We performed CEUS in 121 women with 121 breast lesions. CEUS was done by creating a custom preset on existing ultrasound equipment with the help of an application specialist authorized by the vendor. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively without the use of any commercial software. The pattern of enhancement i.e. homogenous, heterogeneous, peripheral, or no enhancement, and the number of penetrating vessels i.e., few or multiple were recorded. Results were compared with histopathological diagnosis. Results: There were a total of 121 breast lesions. The study showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.67 %, 54.10 %, 65 %, and 80.49% respectively for differentiating benign vs malignant lesions on the basis of the pattern of contrast enhancement. Using penetrating vessels for differentiating malignant lesions from benign lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were found to be 64%, 67.86%, 78.05%, and 51.35% respectively. Conclusion: CEUS is useful in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions. It can be easily performed by creating a custom preset on standard ultrasound equipment without the use of expensive software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.