Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441156›Full record

ArticleDEN open2024

The impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: A single-center retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Go Endo, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Yousuke Nakai, Kota Ishida, Kohei Kurihara, Shuichi Tange, Shinya Takaoka, Yurie Tokito, Yukari Suzuki and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Go EndoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-5746
Kazunaga IshigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-9465
Tsuyoshi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-1385
Kota IshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Kohei KuriharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Shuichi TangeDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Shinya TakaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Yurie TokitoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Yukari SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Hiroki OyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Sachiko KanaiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Tatsunori SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Tatsuya SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Ryunosuke HakutaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-7689
Tomotaka SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Naminatsu TakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Mitsuhiro FujishiroDepartment of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is widely used for the pathological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions but in cases with obstructive jaundice, transpapillary sampling can be performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement. Thus, it is still controversial whether EUS-FNA should be performed prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary stent placement or only after negative transpapillary sampling. Methods: The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic lesions with or without indwelling biliary stents were retrospectively studied in patients undergoing EUS-FNA between January 2017 and December 2021. We also conducted a meta-analysis including our data to compare the accuracy and sensitivity of EUS-FNA with or without biliary stents. Results: A total of 509 patients (40 with biliary stents and 469 without biliary stents) were included. The accuracy (77.5% vs. 94.5%, Conclusions: The presence of biliary stents had a negative impact on the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA, and EUS-FNA prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary stent placement should be considered in cases with obstructive jaundice.

Indexed as

cholangiopancreatographyendoscopic retrogradeendoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspirationjaundiceobstructivepancreatic neoplasmsstents

Identifiers

PMID37441156
PMCPMC10333724
OpenAlexW4383955013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.