Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37441097›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem.

Chandra Goetsch, Julia Gulka, Kevin D Friedland, Arliss J Winship, Jeff Clerc, Andrew Gilbert, Holly F Goyert, Iain J Stenhouse, Kathryn A Williams, Julia R Willmott and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating drivers of recent large whale strandings on the East Coast of the United States.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chandra GoetschBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-5102
Julia GulkaBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.
Kevin D FriedlandNortheast Fisheries Science Center Narragansett Rhode Island USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-0186
Arliss J WinshipCSS, Inc. Fairfax Virginia USA.
Jeff ClercNormandeau Associates Gainesville Florida USA.
Andrew GilbertBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.
Holly F GoyertCSS, Inc. Fairfax Virginia USA.
Iain J StenhouseBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.
Kathryn A WilliamsBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.
Julia R WillmottNormandeau Associates Gainesville Florida USA.
Melinda L RekdahlWildlife Conservation Society, Ocean Giants Program, Bronx Zoo Bronx New York USA.
Howard C RosenbaumWildlife Conservation Society, Ocean Giants Program, Bronx Zoo Bronx New York USA.
Evan M AdamsBiodiversity Research Institute Portland Maine USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-6926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forage fishes are a critical food web link in marine ecosystems, aggregating in a hierarchical patch structure over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Surface-level forage fish aggregations (FFAs) represent a concentrated source of prey available to surface- and shallow-foraging marine predators. Existing survey and analysis methods are often imperfect for studying forage fishes at scales appropriate to foraging predators, making it difficult to quantify predator-prey interactions. In many cases, general distributions of forage fish species are known; however, these may not represent surface-level prey availability to predators. Likewise, we lack an understanding of the oceanographic drivers of spatial patterns of prey aggregation and availability or forage fish community patterns. Specifically, we applied Bayesian joint species distribution models to bottom trawl survey data to assess species- and community-level forage fish distribution patterns across the US Northeast Continental Shelf (NES) ecosystem. Aerial digital surveys gathered data on surface FFAs at two project sites within the NES, which we used in a spatially explicit hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate the abundance and size of surface FFAs. We used these models to examine the oceanographic drivers of forage fish distributions and aggregations. Our results suggest that, in the NES, regions of high community species richness are spatially consistent with regions of high surface FFA abundance. Bathymetric depth drove both patterns, while subsurface features, such as mixed layer depth, primarily influenced aggregation behavior and surface features, such as sea surface temperature, sub-mesoscale eddies, and fronts influenced forage fish diversity. In combination, these models help quantify the availability of forage fishes to marine predators and represent a novel application of spatial models to aerial digital survey data.

Indexed as

forage fish aggregationhierarchical Bayesian modeljoint species distribution modelpredator–prey interactionstrophodynamics

Identifiers

PMID37441097
PMCPMC10334121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.