Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440855›Full record

ArticleIntegrated healthcare journal2022

Enhancing the integration of chaplains within the healthcare team A qualitative analysis of a survey study among healthcare chaplains.

Renske Kruizinga, Carmen Schuhmann, Tina Glasner, Gaby Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated healthcare journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renske KruizingaUniversity for Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-3940
Carmen SchuhmannUniversity for Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tina GlasnerUniversity for Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gaby JacobsUniversity for Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spiritual well-being is considered an important component of health and is increasingly integrated at all levels of healthcare. Delivering good integrated spiritual care requires coordination between different colleagues in which interprofessional collaboration is crucial. However, this interprofessional collaboration is not always self-evident. What spiritual care entails, is often poorly understood by their healthcare colleagues. Developing a shared professional identity is a crucial component of the shift towards professionalisation in chaplaincy. Objectives: We aim to answer the following research question: how do healthcare chaplains in the Netherlands describe their work and their professional identity in relation to other healthcare professionals? Design and subjects: Analysis of open-ended questions of a survey among healthcare chaplains regarding professional self-understanding in the Netherlands. Results: 107 Dutch chaplains working in a healthcare setting completed the five open-ended questions in the survey. The field of healthcare chaplaincy is changing from an exclusive focus at patients, towards more activities at staff and organisational level such as educating other healthcare professionals and, being involved in ethics and policy making. Conclusions: Our research shows that the professional self-understanding of chaplains entails many leads to foster interprofessional collaboration. At the same time, there are concerns about the professional identity of the chaplain which is not always clear to every healthcare professional. Healthcare teams can benefit from an extensive integration of chaplains in the healthcare team, by including the non-patient-related activities of chaplains, such as staff training, moral deliberation and policy advice.

Indexed as

ethicsprofessional competenceprofessional roleteams

Identifiers

PMID37440855
PMCPMC10240735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.