ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2023
The dynamics of the risk perception on a social network and its effect on disease dynamics.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family protection motivation and economic vulnerability: a network analysis of public influenza risk perception, education and mitigation strategies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perceived infection risk changes individual behaviors, which further affects the disease dynamics. This perception is influenced by social communication, including surveying their social network neighbors about the fraction of infected neighbors and averaging their neighbors' perception of the risk. We model the interaction of disease dynamics and risk perception on a two-layer random network that combines a social network layer with a contact network layer. We found that if information spreads much faster than disease, then all individuals converge on the true prevalence of the disease. On the other hand, if the two dynamics have comparable speeds, the risk perception still converges to a value uniformly on the network. However, the perception lags behind the true prevalence and has a lower peak value. We also study the behavior change caused by the perception of infection risk. This behavior change may affect the disease dynamics by reducing the transmission rate along the edges of the contact network or by breaking edges and isolating the infectious individuals. The effects on the basic reproduction number, the peak size, and the final size are studied. We found that these two effects give the same basic reproduction number. We find edge-breaking has a larger effect on reducing the final size, while reducing the transmission rate has a larger effect on reducing the peak size, which is true for both scale-free and Poisson networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.