Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440583›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Highly mismatch-tolerant homology testing by RecA could explain how homology length affects recombination.

Mara Prentiss, Dianzhuo Wang, Jonathan Fu, Chantal Prévost, Veronica Godoy-Carter, Nancy Kleckner, Claudia Danilowicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mara PrentissDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-8945
Dianzhuo WangDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jonathan FuDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-9546
Chantal PrévostLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.
Veronica Godoy-CarterDepartment of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nancy KlecknerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Claudia DanilowiczDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique · FRNortheastern University · US

Funding

Chromosome organization and function in time and space: meiosis, mitosis and E. coliR35GM136322 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Nancy E Kleckner · 2020 to 2026
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In E. coli, double strand breaks (DSBs) are resected and loaded with RecA protein. The genome is then rapidly searched for a sequence that is homologous to the DNA flanking the DSB. Mismatches in homologous partners are rare, suggesting that RecA should rapidly reject mismatched recombination products; however, this is not the case. Decades of work have shown that long lasting recombination products can include many mismatches. In this work, we show that in vitro RecA forms readily observable recombination products when 16% of the bases in the product are mismatched. We also consider various theoretical models of mismatch-tolerant homology testing. The models test homology by comparing the sequences of Ltest bases in two single-stranded DNAs (ssDNA) from the same genome. If the two sequences pass the homology test, the pairing between the two ssDNA becomes permanent. Stringency is the fraction of permanent pairings that join ssDNA from the same positions in the genome. We applied the models to both randomly generated genomes and bacterial genomes. For both randomly generated genomes and bacterial genomes, the models show that if no mismatches are accepted stringency is ∼ 99% when Ltest = 14 bp. For randomly generated genomes, stringency decreases with increasing mismatch tolerance, and stringency improves with increasing Ltest. In contrast, in bacterial genomes when Ltest ∼ 75 bp, stringency is ∼ 99% for both mismatch-intolerant and mismatch-tolerant homology testing. Furthermore, increasing Ltest does not improve stringency because most incorrect pairings join different copies of repeats. In sum, for bacterial genomes highly mismatch tolerant homology testing of 75 bp provides the same stringency as homology testing that rejects all mismatches and testing more than ∼75 base pairs is not useful. Interestingly, in vivo commitment to recombination typically requires homology testing of ∼ 75 bp, consistent with highly mismatch intolerant testing.

Indexed as

DNAEscherichia coliBase PairingDNA, Single-StrandedRec A RecombinasesRecombination, GeneticDNADNA, Single-StrandedRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID37440583
PMCPMC10343044
OpenAlexW4384129496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.