Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The difficulty of aligning intrinsically disordered protein sequences as assessed by conservation and phylogeny.

Andrew C Riley, Daniel A Ashlock, Steffen P Graether

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ASR gene family: a case of tandem-drive evolution.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. SHARK enables sensitive detection of evolutionary homologs and functional analogs in unalignable and disordered sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew C RileyGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel A AshlockGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Steffen P GraetherGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-3936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are proteins that lack a stable 3D structure but maintain a biological function. It has been frequently suggested that IDPs are difficult to align because they tend to have fewer conserved residues compared to ordered proteins, but to our knowledge this has never been directly tested. To compare the alignments of ordered proteins to IDPs, their multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were assessed using two different methods. The first compared the similarity between MSAs produced using the same sequences but created with Clustal Omega, MAFFT, and MUSCLE. The second assessed MSAs based on how well they recapitulated the species tree. These two methods measure the "correctness" of an MSA with two different approaches; the first method measures consistency while the second measures the underlying phylogenetic signal. Proteins that contained both regions of disorder and order were analyzed along with proteins that were fully disordered and fully ordered, using nucleotide, codon and peptide sequence alignments. We observed that IDPs had less similar MSAs than ordered proteins, which is most likely linked to the lower sequence conservation in IDPs. However, comparisons of tree distances found that trees from the ordered sequence MSAs were not significantly closer to the species tree than those inferred from disordered sequence MSAs. Our results show that it is correct to say that IDPs are difficult to align on the basis of MSA consistency, but that this does not equate with alignments being of poor quality when assessed by their ability to correctly infer a species tree.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPhylogenySequence AlignmentIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37440576
PMCPMC10343074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.