Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440523›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development of a neural network model to predict the presence of fentanyl in community drug samples.

Lianping Ti, Cameron J Grant, Samuel Tobias, Dennis K Hore, Richard Laing, Brandon D L Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lianping TiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-438X
Cameron J GrantBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3281-073X
Samuel TobiasBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-8950
Dennis K HoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Richard LaingStrategic Research and Science Development, Health Canada Drug Analysis Service, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Brandon D L MarshallDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-7052
University of British Columbia · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CABrown University · USHealth Canada · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasingly, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is being used as a harm reduction tool to provide people who use drugs real-time information about the contents of their substances. However, FTIR spectroscopy has been shown to have a high detection limit for fentanyl and interpretation of results by a technician can be subjective. This poses concern, given that some synthetic opioids can produce serious toxicity at sub-detectable levels. The objective of this study was to develop a neural network model to identify fentanyl and related analogues more accurately in drug samples compared to traditional analysis by technicians.

methodsData were drawn from samples analyzed point-of-care using combination FTIR spectroscopy and fentanyl immunoassay strips in British Columbia between August 2018 and January 2021. We developed neural network models to predict the presence of fentanyl based on FTIR data. The final model was validated against the results from immunoassay strips. Prediction performance was assessed using F1 score, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and was compared to results obtained from analysis by technicians.

resultsA total of 12,684 samples were included. The neural network model outperformed results from those analyzed by technicians, with an F1 score of 96.4% and an accuracy of 96.4%, compared to 78.4% and 82.4% with a technician, respectively. The AUROC of the model was 99.0%. Fentanyl positive samples correctly detected by the model but not by the technician were typically those with low fentanyl concentrations (median: 2.3% quantity by weight; quartile 1-3: 0.0%-4.6%). DISCUSSION: Neural network models can accurately predict the presence of fentanyl and related analogues using FTIR data, including samples with low fentanyl concentrations. Integrating this tool within drug checking services utilizing FTIR spectroscopy has the potential to improve decision making to reduce the risk of overdose and other negative health outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseFentanylAnalgesics, OpioidBritish ColumbiaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerAnalgesics, OpioidFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID37440523
PMCPMC10343080
OpenAlexW4384161803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.