Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440486›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Video-based interventions to improve self-assessment accuracy among physicians: A systematic review.

Chandni Pattni, Michael Scaffidi, Juana Li, Shai Genis, Nikko Gimpaya, Rishad Khan, Rishi Bansal, Nazi Torabi, Catharine M Walsh, Samir C Grover

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advanced Endoscopy: Future Training Perspectives and Tracks.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandni PattniDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-9830
Michael ScaffidiDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2068-6655
Juana LiDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Shai GenisDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Nikko GimpayaDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rishad KhanDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rishi BansalDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-7945
Nazi TorabiGerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-9123
Catharine M WalshDepartment of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Samir C GroverDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelf-assessment of a physician's performance in both procedure and non-procedural activities can be used to identify their deficiencies to allow for appropriate corrective measures. Physicians are inaccurate in their self-assessments, which may compromise opportunities for self- development. To improve this accuracy, video-based interventions of physicians watching their own performance, an experts' performance or both, have been proposed to inform their self-assessment. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of video-based interventions targeting improved self-assessment accuracy among physicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, EBM reviews, and Scopus databases from inception to August 23, 2022, using combinations of terms for "self-assessment", "video-recording", and "physician". Eligible studies were empirical investigations assessing the effect of video-based interventions on physicians' self-assessment accuracy with a comparison of self-assessment accuracy pre- and post- video intervention. We defined self-assessment accuracy as a "direct comparison between an external evaluator and self-assessment that was quantified using formal statistical analysis". Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated quality of evidence. A narrative synthesis was conducted, as variable outcomes precluded a meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 2,376 papers were initially retrieved. Of these, 22 papers were selected for full-text review; a final 9 studies met inclusion criteria for data extraction. Across studies, 240 participants from 5 specialties were represented. Video-based interventions included self-video review (8/9), benchmark video review (3/9), and/or a combination of both types (1/9). Five out of nine studies reported that participants had inaccurate self-assessment at baseline. After the intervention, 5 of 9 studies found a statistically significant improvement in self-assessment accuracy.

conclusionsOverall, current data suggests video-based interventions can improve self-assessment accuracy. Benchmark video review may enable physicians to improve self-assessment accuracy, especially for those with limited experience performing a particular clinical skill. In contrast, self-video review may be able to provide improvement in self-assessment accuracy for more experience physicians. Future research should use standardized methods of comparison for self-assessment accuracy, such as the Bland-Altman analysis, to facilitate meta-analytic summation.

Indexed as

PhysiciansClinical CompetenceHumansSelf-Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37440486
PMCPMC10343035
OpenAlexW4384156380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.