Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Latrine utilization and associated factors among districts implementing and not-implementing community-led total sanitation and hygiene in East Wollega, Western Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Adisu Tafari Shama, Dufera Rikitu Terefa, Edosa Tesfaye Geta, Melese Chego Cheme, Bayise Biru, Jira Wakoya Feyisa, Matiyos Lema, Adisu Ewunetu Desisa, Bikila Regassa Feyisa, Dejene Seyoum Gebre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adisu Tafari ShamaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-8963-9390
Dufera Rikitu TerefaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-7163
Edosa Tesfaye GetaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Melese Chego ChemeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Bayise BiruDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Jira Wakoya FeyisaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Matiyos LemaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Adisu Ewunetu DesisaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Bikila Regassa FeyisaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.
Dejene Seyoum GebreDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemt, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDischarge of excreta to the environment lead to surface and groundwater contamination and human exposure to disease-causing micro-organisms. There is limitation of evidences regarding the latrine utilization among community-led total sanitation and hygiene implemented and non-implemented districts of the East Wollega Zone. Hence, this study aimed to determine the magnitude and associated factors of latrine utilization among households in community-led total sanitation and hygiene implemented and non-implemented Districts in East Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. A Multi-stage sampling technique was applied to select the 461 households. Data were collected using interviews and observations guided by a pre-structured questionnaire. Data were entered using Epi Data and exported to SPSS software version 25 for data recording, cleaning, and statistical analysis. Bivariable logistic regression was run to identify the candidate variables at p-value <0.25. Variables that had associations with latrine utilization in the bi-variable analysis were entered together into multivariable logistic regression. An Adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated and P-value< 0.05 was used to declare a statistically significant association.

resultThe overall prevalence of latrine utilization was found to be 52.7% (95%CI:48%, 57.3%). Religion (AOR = 0.149;95%CI:0.044,0.506), education (AOR = 3.861;95%CI:1.642,9.077), occupation, absence of children <5 years (AOR = 4.724;95%CI:2.313,9.648), toilet cleaning (AOR = 10.662;95%CI:5.571,20.403), frequency of latrine construction (AOR = 6.441;95%CI:2.203,18.826), maintenance need (AOR = 6.446; 95%CI:3.023,13.744), distance from health institution (AOR = 0.987; 95%CI:0.978, 0.996), distance from kebele office (AOR = 6.478; 95%CI:2.137,19.635), and latrine distance from dwelling (AOR = 11.656; 95%CI:2.108, 64.44) were the factors associated with latrine use.

conclusionThe latrine utilization in this study is low as compared to other studies. Religion, education, occupation, absence of children <5 years, toilet cleaning, frequency of latrine construction, maintenance need of the toilet, distance from health institution, distance from kebele, and latrine distance from dwelling are the associated factors of latrine utilization. Both households and health workers have to work together to improve latrine utilization and the safe disposal of children's feces.

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesChildCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHumansHygieneRural Population

Identifiers

PMID37440482
PMCPMC10343159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.