Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37440305›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2023

Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation: Systematic Framework for App Review and Analysis.

Krysten W Bold, Kathleen A Garrison, Angela DeLucia, Mark Horvath, Milton Nguyen, Erica Camacho, John Torous

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krysten W Bold *Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-6118
Kathleen A GarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-1351
Angela DeLuciaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-2805-4580
Mark HorvathDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-9536
Milton NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-4539-7017
Erica CamachoDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-8853
John TorousDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-7937

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
SUBSTANCE ABUSEK12DA000167 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHANIE S O'MALLEY, Marc N Potenza · 1991 to 2026
$17.7M
Smartband/smartphone-based automatic smoking detection and real time mindfulness interventionR34AT010365 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GARRISON, KATHLEEN A. · 2019 to 2020
$754k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCCIH NIH HHS R34 AT010365NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA000167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCigarette smoking is a leading cause of preventable death, and identifying novel treatment approaches to promote smoking cessation is critical for improving public health. With the rise of digital health and mobile apps, these tools offer potential opportunities to address smoking cessation, yet the functionality of these apps and whether they offer scientifically based support for smoking cessation are unknown.

objectiveThe goal of this research was to use the American Psychiatric Association app evaluation model to evaluate the top-returned apps from Android and Apple app store platforms related to smoking cessation and investigate the common app features available for end users.

methodsWe conducted a search of both Android and iOS app stores in July 2021 for apps related to the keywords "smoking," "tobacco," "smoke," and "cigarette" to evaluate apps for smoking cessation. Apps were screened for relevance, and trained raters identified and analyzed features, including accessibility (ie, cost), privacy, clinical foundation, and features of the apps, using a systematic framework of 105 objective questions from the American Psychiatric Association app evaluation model. All app rating data were deposited in mindapps, a publicly accessible database that is continuously updated every 6 months given the dynamic nature of apps available in the marketplace. We characterized apps available in July 2021 and November 2022.

resultsWe initially identified 389 apps, excluded 161 due to irrelevance and nonfunctioning, and rated 228, including 152 available for Android platforms and 120 available for iOS platforms. Some of the top-returned apps (71/228, 31%) in 2021 were no longer functioning in 2022. Our analysis of rated apps revealed limitations in accessibility and features. While most apps (179/228, 78%) were free to download, over half had costs associated with in-app purchases or full use. Less than 65% (149/228) had a privacy policy addressing the data collected in the app. In terms of intervention features, more than 56% (128/228) of apps allowed the user to set and check in on goals, and more than 46% (106/228) of them provided psychoeducation, although few apps provided evidence-based support for smoking cessation, such as peer support or skill training, including mindfulness and deep breathing, and even fewer provided evidence-based interventions, such as acceptance and commitment therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. Only 12 apps in 2021 and 11 in 2022 had published studies supporting the feasibility or efficacy for smoking cessation.

conclusionsNumerous smoking cessation apps were identified, but analysis revealed limitations, including high rates of irrelevant and nonfunctioning apps, high rates of turnover, and few apps providing evidence-based support for smoking cessation. Thus, it may be challenging for consumers to identify relevant, evidence-based apps to support smoking cessation in the app store, and a comprehensive evaluation system of mental health apps is critically important.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyMobile ApplicationsSmoking CessationHumansMotivationPrivacySmartphoneaddictapplicationapp reviewappscessationcigarettedigital healthmhealthmobile appmobile healthquitreview of appsmartphone appsmokersmokingsmoking cessationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID37440305
PMCPMC10375280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.