ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2023
[Research questions in participatory projects. Critical reflections from the project "Longing in later life"].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA central component of participatory research is the collaborative, nonhierarchical work of co-researchers and academic researchers. The development of a research question has a special importance as it entails different meanings for those involved. For academic researchers the research question is focussed on gaining knowledge and is developed at an early stage of the project. For co-researchers the development and the finding of answers to a question are less important than the possibility of jointly changing their social reality.
objectiveThis article investigates how these different interests influence the collaborative development of a research question and which factors can enhance the process. MATERIAL AND
methodsBased on experiences from the participatory action research project "Longing in later life" and critical reflections, this article unpacks the different roles of the participants in the project and the process of co-creation.
conclusionA joint development of a research question is time consuming and depends on the extent of shared experiences and the degree of marginalization among the group of co-researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37439852What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.