ArticleCancer biology & therapy2023
Developing and characterizing a two-layered safety switch for cell therapies.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineered Neutrophils in Translational Medicine: Gene Editing, Nanotechnology, and AI-Driven Clinical Breakthroughs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Safety Assessment of Stem Cell-Based Therapies: Current Standards and Advancing Frameworks.Cells · 2025Review
- An inducible RIPK3-driven necroptotic system enhances cancer cell-based immunotherapy and ensures safety.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Engineering immune-evasive allogeneic cellular immunotherapies.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2024
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene edited and engineered cell-based therapies are a promising approach for treating a variety of disorders, including cancer. However, the ability of engineered cells to persist for prolonged periods along with possible toxicity raises concerns over the safety of these approaches. Although a number of different one-dimensional suicide systems have been incorporated into therapeutic cell types, the incorporation of a two-layered suicide system that allows controlled killing of therapeutic cells at different time points is needed. In this study, we engineered a variety of therapeutic cells to express two different kill switches, RapaCasp9 and HSV-TK and utilized Rapamycin and Ganciclovir respectively to activate these kill switches. We show that the function of both RapaCasp9 and HSV-TK molecules is preserved and can be activated to induce apoptosis detected early (24 h) and late (48 h) post-activation respectively, with no toxicity. In vivo, we show the eradication of a majority of cells after treatment in subcutaneous and orthotopic models. Furthermore, we demonstrate how both suicide switches work independently and can be activated sequentially for an improved killing, thus ensuring a failsafe mechanism in case the activation of a single one of them is not sufficient to eliminate the cells. Our findings highlight the reliability of the double suicide system, effective on a variety of cells with different biological characteristics, independent of their anatomic presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.