Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37439771›Full record

SynthesisThe Gerontologist2024

The Effectiveness and Characteristics of Communication Partner Training Programs for Families of People With Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Naomi Folder, Emma Power, Rachael Rietdijk, Iben Christensen, Leanne Togher, Deborah Parker

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rehabilitation Services for Young-Onset Dementia: Examples from High- and Low-Middle-Income Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Communication partner training for aged-care workers: A scoping review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naomi FolderFaculty of Health, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-9553
Emma PowerFaculty of Health, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-0406
Rachael RietdijkFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4343-4039
Iben ChristensenDepartment of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-9061
Leanne TogherFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4518-6748
Deborah ParkerFaculty of Health, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-8613

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCommunication partner training (CPT) is essential in dementia care. Despite families being the largest group of community carers, previous reviews primarily focused on formal carers. This study aimed to understand the characteristics and effectiveness of CPT for families of people with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThe systematic review included intervention/protocol studies on dementia CPT for families, excluding formal carers and programs not focused on communication. CINAHL, PsycINFO, SpeechBITE, Medline, SCOPUS, and Embase were searched between November 30 and December 6, 2021. After deduplication, 3,172 records were screened. Quality assessment used JBI Critical Appraisal tools and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data synthesis utilized three reporting tools, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, and content analysis.

resultsOf 30 studies (27 programs), there were 10 quasi-experimental, 5 RCTs, 4 mixed methods, 4 case studies, 4 qualitative, and 2 protocols. Studies were published between 1998 and 2021 and included 671 family members. Characteristics varied with 7/27 programs including consumers during creation and one program including telehealth. One study included all reporting tool criteria. Programs typically used 4 intervention functions, with 12/27 programs addressing 3 behavior change areas. 33/74 outcome measures targeted the "Environment" of the person with dementia. Studies showed positive improvements in communication skills and knowledge, with mixed results on behavior/psychosocial outcomes. Qualitative results identified improvements in conversation and attitudes. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: CPT for families improves communication outcomes, however, quality of studies varied significantly. Future research should address gaps in telehealth, consumer involvement, and intervention descriptions.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunicationDementiaFamilyHumansProgram EvaluationConversationDementia careInformal carerStrategiesSupport

Identifiers

PMID37439771
PMCPMC10949353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.