ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2023
Spelling-to-sound translation for English disyllables: Use of long and short vowels before single medial consonants.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical learning in spelling and reading.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- The role of context in the reading of English vowels: Evidence from ‹s› clusters.Glossa psycholinguistics · 2025Article
- The English Sublexical Toolkit: Methods for indexing sound-spelling consistency.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Spelling-to-sound translation for English disyllables: Use of long and short vowels before single medial consonants.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The English writing system is often seen as having rules that govern the choice between alternative pronunciations of letters but as having many exceptions to the rules. One postulated rule, the V̄|CV rule, is that a vowel is pronounced as long rather than short when it is followed by a single consonant letter plus a vowel letter. We find, in an analysis of English disyllabic words, that exceptions to the V̄|CV rule are not randomly scattered throughout the vocabulary. The use of long versus short vowels is systematically influenced by the identity of the vowel letter itself, the characteristics of the following consonant, and the identity of the word ending. In four studies with a total of 283 participants, we asked university students to pronounce disyllabic nonwords with medial vowel-consonant-vowel sequences and choose the better pronunciation of the first vowel, long or short. Participants were generally sensitive to the effects found in the vocabulary. However, participants used fewer long vowels than expected on the basis of the vocabulary statistics calculated for disyllabic words. We consider possible reasons for this difference and implications for statistical-learning views of reading. Given that the V̄|CV rule is sometimes taught as a part of phonics programs, we also consider implications for reading instruction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.