Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37439161›Full record

ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2023

[Reliability and validity of the 6-item UCLA Loneliness Scale(ULS-6)for application in adults].

R Xiao, J DU

Abstract readEnglish AbstractValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation to colorectal cancer and ostomy: Psychological flexibility mitigates loneliness associated with social withdrawal.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R XiaoDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
J DUDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties and applicability of the 6-item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale (ULS-6) in adults.

methodsWe conducted 2 surveys to assess the validity of different measurement scales and questionnaires. In Survey 1, a total of 1480 adults were measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), and the data were used for item analysis and assessment of the reliability, validity and measurement invariance. In Survey 2, UCLA Loneliness Scale was used for measurement in 652 college students, and the data were used for analysis of the criterion validity of ULS-6; 3 weeks later, 300 of the students were retested using ULS-6 to assess the retest reliability of the scale.

resultsItem analysis suggested that the items in ULS-6 all had good discrimination power with discrimination indexes all above 0.775 (

conclusionThe ULS-6 has good reliability, validity and applicability for measurement of loneliness in Chinese adults.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleEmotionsLonelinessAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsStudents6-item University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scalelonelinessmeasurement invariancereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37439161
PMCPMC10339310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.