Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37439021›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Availability of cancer care services and the organization of care delivery at critical access hospitals.

Ira S Moscovice, Helen Parsons, Nathan Bean, Xiomara Santana, Kate Weis, Jane Yuet Ching Hui, Megan Lahr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ira S MoscoviceFlex Monitoring Team, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Helen ParsonsDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-9858
Nathan BeanHennepin County Department of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Xiomara SantanaFlex Monitoring Team, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kate WeisUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jane Yuet Ching HuiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2628-0720
Megan LahrFlex Monitoring Team, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3648-9085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritical access hospitals (CAHs) provide an opportunity to meet the needs of individuals with cancer in rural areas. Two common innovative care delivery methods include the use of traveling oncologists and teleoncology. It is important to understand the availability and organization of cancer care services in CAHs due to the growing population with cancer and expected declines in oncology workforce in rural areas.

methodsStratified random sampling was used to generate a sample of 50 CAHs from each of the four U.S. Census Bureau-designated regions resulting in a total sample of 200 facilities. Analyses were conducted from 135 CAH respondents to understand the availability of cancer care services and organization of cancer care across CAHs.

resultsAlmost all CAHs (95%) provided at least one cancer screening or diagnostic service. Forty-six percent of CAHs reported providing at least one component of cancer treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery) at their facility. CAHs that offered cancer treatment reported a wide range of health care staff involvement, including 34% of respondents reporting involvement of a local oncologist, 38% reporting involvement of a visiting oncologist, and 28% reporting involvement of a non-local oncologist using telemedicine.

conclusionGrowing disparities within rural areas emphasize the importance of ensuring access to timely screening and guideline-recommended treatment for cancer in rural communities. These data demonstrated that CAHs are addressing the growing need through a variety of approaches including the use of innovative models that utilize non-local providers and telemedicine to expand access to crucial services for rural residents with cancer.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsHospitalsHumansaccesscare deliverycritical access hospitalruralteleoncology

Identifiers

PMID37439021
PMCPMC10501243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.