ReviewEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2024
Templated insertions-DNA repair gets acrobatic.
Review in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interfering with DNA repair pathways to enhance CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair in a chelicerate genetic model.iScience · 2026Article
- Review
- Mechanisms and genomic implications of break-induced replication.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Review
- Repeat expansion in a fragile X model is independent of double strand break repair mediated by Pol θ, RAD52, RAD54 or RAD54B.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Evolutionary Potential of Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Repeat expansion in a Fragile X model is independent of double strand break repair mediated by Pol θ, Rad52, Rad54l or Rad54b.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Replication stress induces POLQ-mediated structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites after entry into mitosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Inspiring basic and applied research in genome integrity mechanisms: Dedication to Samuel H. Wilson.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deletions associated with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks is a source of genetic alternation and a recognized source of disease-causing mutagenesis. Theta-mediated end joining is a DNA repair mechanism, which guarantees deletions by its employment of microhomology (MH) alignment to facilitate end joining. A lesser-characterized templated insertion ability of this pathway, on the other hand, is associated with both deletion and insertion. This mechanism is characterized by at least one round of polymerase θ-mediated synthesis, which does not result in successful repair, followed by a subsequent round of polymerase engagement and synthesis that does lead to repair. Here we focus on the mechanisms by which polymerase θ introduces these insertions-direct, inverse, and a new class which we have termed strand switching. We observe this new class of templated insertions at multiple loci and across multiple species, often at a comparable frequency to those previously characterized. Templated insertion mutations are often enriched in cancer genomes and repeat expansion disorders. This repair mechanism thus contributes to disease-associated mutagenesis, and may plausibly even promote disease. Characterization of the types of polymerase θ-dependent insertions can provide new insight into these diseases and clinical promise for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.