ArticleProtoplasma2024
Cellular toxicity and DNA damage induced by Newbouldia laevis used for male infertility treatment in prokaryotic and eukaryotic models.
Article in Protoplasma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional medicinal knowledge and diversity of medicinal plants in Benin: a systematic review (2014-2023).BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks, and cytogenotoxicity of wastewaters from natural and artificial fishponds indiscriminately disposed in Nigeria.Toxicology research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leaves of Newbouldia laevis have been extensively used in solving problems associated with infertility and childbirth in many African countries. Yet, information is very limited on the DNA damaging potential of this plant. This study evaluated the cytogenotoxic effect of the aqueous extract of N. laevis leaf using prokaryotic models (Ames Salmonella fluctuation test using TA100 and TA98 strains of Salmonella typhimurium and SOS Chromotest with Escherichia coli PQ37) and eukaryotic model (Allium cepa root cells). Identification of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and phytochemical screening of the plant extract were also performed. Onion bulbs were grown on each concentration (1 to 50%; v/v, extract/tap water) of the extract for chromosomal aberrations and root growth analyses. Results of the Ames test indicated that the extract is mutagenic while the SOS Chromotest results showed good complementation to the Ames test results, although the E. coli PQ37 system showed slightly higher sensitivity in the detection of mutagenicity and genotoxicity of the extract. The plant extract was cytotoxic when compared to the control, inducing a significant (p < 0.05) concentration-dependent inhibition of root growth from 5 to 50% concentrations. At 50% concentration, the extract completely inhibited cell division in the A. cepa. Also, chromosomal aberration increased significantly (p < 0.05) in exposed onions from 5 to 20% concentrations. The mutagenicity and cytogenotoxicity recorded in this report were believed to be caused by the presence of VOCs such as 1,2,3-benzene-triol, 1,2-benzenediol, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and alkaloids in the extract an indication of the cytogenotoxicity of the aqueous extract of N. laevis leaf even at low concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.