Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37438589›Full record

ArticleNature2023

Practical recommendations for using ctDNA in clinical decision making.

Stacey A Cohen, Minetta C Liu, Alexey Aleshin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07214532 (SIgnatera-Guided Initiation of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Intermediate Risk HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
34.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07214532 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

SIgnatera-Guided Initiation of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Intermediate Risk HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNatera, Inc.Ran2026 to 2037Enrolled725ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Receptors, Estrogen (for ER-positive Requirement)ArmsctDNA-Guided Treatment Strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment for Treatment Monitoring Adds Value to PSA in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacey A CohenFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA. shiovitz@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-9856
Minetta C LiuNatera, Austin, TX, USA.
Alexey AleshinNatera, Austin, TX, USA.
Natera (United States) · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous improvement in cancer care over the past decade has led to a gradual decrease in cancer-related deaths. This is largely attributed to improved treatment and disease management strategies. Early detection of recurrence using blood-based biomarkers such as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is being increasingly used in clinical practice. Emerging real-world data shows the utility of ctDNA in detecting molecular residual disease and in treatment-response monitoring, helping clinicians to optimize treatment and surveillance strategies. Many studies have indicated ctDNA to be a sensitive and specific biomarker for recurrence. However, most of these studies are largely observational or anecdotal in nature, and peer-reviewed data regarding the use of ctDNA are mainly indication-specific. Here we provide general recommendations on the clinical utility of ctDNA and how to interpret ctDNA analysis in different treatment settings, especially in patients with solid tumours. Specifically, we provide an understanding around the implications, strengths and limitations of this novel biomarker and how to best apply the results in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAClinical Decision-MakingNeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeer ReviewBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID37438589
OpenAlexW4384025484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.