Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37438515›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Molecular features of androgen-receptor low, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers in the Carolina breast cancer study.

Nikita D Jinna, Sarah Van Alsten, Padmashree Rida, Victoria L Seewaldt, Melissa A Troester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikita D Jinna *Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. niwright@coh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-2881
Sarah Van Alsten *Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Padmashree RidaDepartment of Science, Rowland Hall, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Victoria L SeewaldtDepartment of Population Sciences, City of Hope Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Reproduction, Lactation and Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer SubtypesP01CA151135 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2017
$18.1M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA151135NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIH HHS NIH/NCI P50-CA058223NIH HHS P01CA151135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAndrogen receptor (AR) expression is absent in 40-90% of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers. The prognostic value of AR in ER-negative patients and therapeutic targets for patients absent in AR remains poorly explored.

methodsWe used an RNA-based multigene classifier to identify AR-low and AR-high ER-negative participants in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; N = 669) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; N = 237). We compared AR-defined subgroups by demographics, tumor characteristics, and established molecular signatures [PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and immune response].

resultsAR-low tumors were more prevalent among younger (RFD =  + 10%, 95% CI = 4% to 16%) participants in CBCS and were associated with HER2 negativity (RFD = - 35%, 95% CI = - 44% to - 26%), higher grade (RFD =  + 17%, 95% CI = 8% to 26%), and higher risk of recurrence scores (RFD =  + 22%, 95% CI = 16.1% to 28%), with similar results in TCGA. The AR-low subgroup was strongly associated with HRD in CBCS (RFD =  + 33.3%, 95% CI = 23.8% to 43.2%) and TCGA (RFD =  + 41.5%, 95% CI = 34.0% to 48.6%). In CBCS, AR-low tumors had high adaptive immune marker expression.

conclusionMultigene, RNA-based low AR expression is associated with aggressive disease characteristics as well as DNA repair defects and immune phenotypes, suggesting plausible precision therapies for AR-low, ER-negative patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAndrogensErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansPrognosisReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenRNAAndrogensErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenRNAAndrogen receptorCarolina breast cancer studyDNA repairEstrogen receptorMultigene signatureTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID37438515
PMCPMC10361868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.