ArticleScientific reports2023
Sustainable fisheries management through reliable restocking and stock enhancement evaluation with environmental DNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population Structure of Lenok (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Catching common carp with eDNA in Thailand's rivers.iScience · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the tropical sea cucumber Bohadschia ocellate.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Review
- Unraveling Fish Community Diversity and Structure in the Yellow Sea: Evidence from Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Bottom Trawling.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Population Genetic Investigation ofBiology · 2024Article
- An epigenetic toolbox for conservation biologists.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Stock Assessment of the Commercial Small Pelagic Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, the South China Sea, 2006-2020.Biology · 2024Article
- An eDNA-based assessment ofEcology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The practise of restocking and stock improvement as a means of managing fisheries and aquaculture has been widely used. However, it is difficult to claim that fish stocking is effective due to a number of challenges. One of those is the lack of suitable monitoring and assessment methods, although all assessment approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. If the full benefits of fisheries and their long-term sustainability are to be realised, it is necessary to examine the effectiveness of restocking and stock enhancement. Therefore, effective, rapid, and dependable monitoring techniques are necessary. In this study, we used an eDNA-based method to identify G. cambodgiensis at 14 sites throughout Thailand's restocking and stock enhancement programme. eDNA from this species was identified in water samples using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) tests with primers and a probe specific to G. cambodgiensis. A successful stocking would show positive eDNA results in water samples collected from the studied sites. Only five of the studied sites returned positive eDNA readings, which could be considered a successful stocking. The locations that contained G. cambodgiensis eDNA were either confirmed to be natural habitats or were regularly stocked with a large number of hatchery fish. In this study, we demonstrated that eDNA is a reliable, fast and accurate alternative method for measuring stock improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.