Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37438124›Full record

ReviewNeurology2023

Variation in Endpoints in FDA Medication Approvals: A Review of Acute and Preventive Migraine Medications.

Leigh K Sharpless, Aaron S Kesselheim, Serena L Orr, Jonathan Darrow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leigh K SharplessFrom the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (L.K.S.), Harvard University, Cambridge; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (L.K.S., A.S.K., J.D.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (S.L.O.), Pediatrics; and University of Calgary (S.L.O.), Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7488-2638
Aaron S KesselheimFrom the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (L.K.S.), Harvard University, Cambridge; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (L.K.S., A.S.K., J.D.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (S.L.O.), Pediatrics; and University of Calgary (S.L.O.), Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-2666
Serena L OrrFrom the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (L.K.S.), Harvard University, Cambridge; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (L.K.S., A.S.K., J.D.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (S.L.O.), Pediatrics; and University of Calgary (S.L.O.), Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2879-811X
Jonathan DarrowFrom the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (L.K.S.), Harvard University, Cambridge; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (L.K.S., A.S.K., J.D.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (S.L.O.), Pediatrics; and University of Calgary (S.L.O.), Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta, Canada. dr.jonathan_darrow@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-4243

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTo assess the characteristics and extent of variation of the endpoints used in trials supporting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of medications treating migraine.

methodsUsing the Drugs@FDA online database, we identified novel prescription medications approved by the FDA between January 2001 and September 2022, for migraine with or without aura, for both acute and preventive treatment, and for episodic and chronic presentations. For each medication, we used the most recent FDA-approved labeling to identify indication, mechanism of action, mode of administration, manufacturer, approval year, number of pivotal trials, trial design, and primary endpoints.

resultsSixteen FDA-approved medications for the acute or preventive treatment of migraine were supported by 45 pivotal trials. There were 5 primary endpoint types: (1) change in mean monthly migraine days from baseline; (2) change in mean monthly migraine attacks from baseline; (3) change in mean monthly headache days from baseline; (4) mild to no pain After 2 hours; (5) pain free at 2 hours. There were 3 combinations of coprimary endpoints: (1) Headache Pain Free at 2 Hours DISCUSSION: Migraine medication trial endpoints were inconsistent within the same indication (episodic or chronic), mechanistic class, and route of administration, frustrating direct comparison among these medications. Furthermore, inconsistent definitions for the indications "episodic" and "chronic" migraine were also observed. Consistent endpoint selection for medications approved for preventive and acute migraine treatment would enhance the ability of patients, physicians, and payers to make informed choices among these medications.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersDouble-Blind MethodHeadacheHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID37438124
PMCPMC10491441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.