Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437997›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2023

Women's empowerment, production choices, and crop diversity in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.

Kaela Connors, Lindsay M Jaacks, Ananya Awasthi, Karoline Becker, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Emily Fivian, Aulo Gelli, Helen Harris-Fry, Jessica Heckert, Suneetha Kadiyala and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kaela ConnorsHarvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Lindsay M JaacksHarvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Ananya AwasthiAnuvaad Solutions, New Delhi, India.
Karoline BeckerDepartment of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rachel Bezner KerrDepartment of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Emily FivianDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Aulo GelliInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jessica HeckertInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Suneetha KadiyalaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Elena MartinezFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Marianne V SantosoDepartment of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Sera L YoungDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Lilia BliznashkaGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK; International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: l.bliznashka@cgiar.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBolstering farm-level crop diversity is one strategy to strengthen food system resilience and achieve global food security. Women who live in rural areas play an essential role in food production; therefore, we aimed to assess the associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity.

methodsIn this secondary analysis of cross-sectional data, we used data from four cluster-randomised controlled trials done in Burkina Faso, India, Malawi, and Tanzania. We assessed women's empowerment using indicators from the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index. Farm-level crop diversity measures were the number of food crops grown, number of food groups grown, and if nutrient-dense crops were grown. We used a two-stage modelling approach. First, we analysed covariate-adjusted country-specific associations between women's empowerment and crop diversity indicators using multivariable generalised linear models. Second, we pooled country-specific associations using random-effects models.

findingsThe final analytic sample included 1735 women from Burkina Faso, 4450 women from India, 547 women from Malawi, and 574 women from Tanzania. Across all countries, compared with households in which women provided input into fewer productive decisions, households of women with greater input into productive decisions produced more food crops (mean difference 0·36 [95% CI 0·16-0·55]), a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·16 [0·06-0·25]), and more nutrient-dense crops (percentage point difference 3 [95% CI 3-4]). Across all countries, each additional community group a woman actively participated in was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·20 [0·04-0·35]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·11 [0·03-0·18]), but not more nutrient-dense crops. In pooled associations from Burkina Faso and India, asset ownership was associated with cultivating a higher number of food crops (mean difference 0·08 [0·04-0·12]) and a higher number of food groups (mean difference 0·05 [0·04-0·07]), but not more nutrient-dense crops.

interpretationGreater women's empowerment was associated with higher farm-level crop diversity among low-income agricultural households, suggesting that it could help enhance efforts to strengthen food system resilience.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalBurkina FasoCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGender RoleHumansIndiaMalawiRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTanzania

Identifiers

PMID37437997
PMCPMC10352962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.