Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437963›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2023

Targeting emotional regulation using an Internet-delivered psychological intervention for cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial.

Isabelle S Smith, Marie-Abèle Bind, Karen L Weihs, Bei Bei, Joshua F Wiley

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabelle S SmithSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7395-1358
Marie-Abèle BindBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-6651
Karen L WeihsDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-8560
Bei BeiSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9660-6573
Joshua F WileySchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-6702
Monash University · AUMassachusetts General Hospital · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Transporting established insights from classical experimental design to address causal questions in environmental epidemiology including the understanding of biological mediating mechanismsDP5OD021412 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIND, MARIE-ABELE CATHERINE · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIH HHS DP5 OD021412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis trial assessed the efficacy of an emotion-focused, modular, Internet-delivered adaptation of the Unified Protocol (UP) in improving cancer survivors' emotion regulation strategies.

designA two-arm randomized controlled trial (1:1) was used to compare the efficacy of two Internet-based interventions: UP-adapted CanCope Mind (CM) and lifestyle-focused active control CanCope Lifestyle (CL).

methodsN = 224 cancer survivors randomized to CM or CL were assessed at baseline, between-modules, at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up on emotion regulation outcomes targeted by each CM module (Module 1: beliefs about emotions; Module 2: mindfulness; Module 3: cognitive reappraisal skills, catastrophizing, refocus on planning; Module 4: experiential avoidance). Primary analyses were intention-to-treat linear regressions using Fisher randomization tests for p-values and intervals were used to compare groups with standardized mean difference (SMD) effect sizes.

resultsCanCope Mind participants (n = 61 completers) experienced moderate-to-large improvements (SMDs from .44-.88) across all outcomes at post-intervention. CM's effects were larger than CL's (n = 75 completers) immediately post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up for beliefs about emotions, mindfulness, cognitive reappraisals and experiential avoidance (all p's < .05). CM experienced greater improvements in catastrophizing immediately post-intervention, with a trending effect at follow-up. However, we could not reject the null hypothesis of identical between-group effects for refocusing on planning both immediately post-intervention and at follow-up. Exploratory analyses revealed inconsistent between-module effects.

conclusionsIn its entirety, CM is a promising intervention for improving and maintaining cancer survivors' adaptive emotion regulation, especially for mindfulness and experiential avoidance. This may have important clinical implications for promoting cancer survivors' emotional functioning and general well-being.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsEmotional RegulationInternet-Based InterventionNeoplasmsEmotionsHumansPsychosocial Interventioncancer survivorsemotion regulationInternet-delivered interventionspsycho-oncologytransdiagnosticunified protocol

Identifiers

PMID37437963
PMCPMC10710879
OpenAlexW4384023581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.