Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437830›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2023

Family History of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Genetics Predict Progression to Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration Adjusting for Macular Status, Demographic, and Lifestyle Factors.

Johanna M Seddon, Dikha De, Bernard Rosner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An siRNA targetingMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna M SeddonFrom the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (J.M.S., D.D.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. Electronic address: johanna_seddon@yahoo.com.
Dikha DeFrom the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (J.M.S., D.D.), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Bernard RosnerDepartment of Medicine (B.R.), Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

ETIOLOGIC STUDIES OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATIONR01EY011309 · NEI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 2003 to 2017
$9.3M
Use of Correlated Data Methods in OphthalmologyR01EY022445 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2013 to 2025
$4.6M
Rare Genetic Variation in Macular DegenerationR01EY028602 · NEI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SEDDON, JOHANNA M · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR OPHTHALMOLOGIC AND CLUSTER DATAR01EY012269 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 1998 to 2008
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011309NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012269NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022445NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if a family history of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and genetic variants identify eyes at higher risk for progression to advanced AMD (AAMD), after controlling for baseline demographics, behavioral factors, and macular status.

designProspective, longitudinal cohort study.

methodsEyes were classified using the Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale. Non-genetic and genetic predictors for progression to AAMD, geographic atrophy, and neovascular disease were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards models using the eye as the unit of analysis were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), accounting for correlated data. Discrimination between progressing and non-progressing eyes was assessed using C-statistics and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

resultsAmong 4910 eyes, 863 progressed to AAMD over 12 years. Baseline AMD severity scale and status of the fellow eye were important predictors; genes provided additional discrimination. A family history of AMD also independently predicted progression after accounting for genetic and other covariates: 1 family member versus none (HR 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.02-1.43]; P = 0.03); ≥2 family members versus none (HR 1.55 [95% CI 1.26-1.90]; P < 0.001). A composite risk score calculated using β estimates of both non-genetic and significant genetic factors predicted progression to AAMD (HR 5.57; 90

conclusionGenetic variants and family history provided additional discrimination for predicting progression to AAMD, after accounting for baseline macular status and other covariates.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationDemographyDisease ProgressionHumansLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37437830
PMCPMC11694608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.