Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437086›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Better late than never: Optimising the proteomic analysis of field-collected octopus.

Qiaz Q H Hua, Clifford Young, Tara L Pukala, Jasmin C Martino, Peter Hoffmann, Bronwyn M Gillanders, Zoe A Doubleday

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaz Q H HuaEnvironment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-7273
Clifford YoungFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-286X
Tara L PukalaDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7391-1436
Jasmin C MartinoFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Peter HoffmannFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Bronwyn M GillandersEnvironment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Zoe A DoubledayFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics, the temporal study of proteins expressed by an organism, is a powerful technique that can reveal how organisms respond to biological perturbations, such as disease and environmental stress. Yet, the use of proteomics for addressing ecological questions has been limited, partly due to inadequate protocols for the sampling and preparation of animal tissues from the field. Although RNAlater is an ideal alternative to freezing for tissue preservation in transcriptomics studies, its suitability for the field could be more broadly examined. Moreover, existing protocols require samples to be preserved immediately to maintain protein integrity, yet the effects of delays in preservation on proteomic analyses have not been thoroughly tested. Hence, we optimised a proteomic workflow for wild-caught samples. First, we conducted a preliminary in-lab test using SDS-PAGE analysis on aquaria-reared Octopus berrima confirming that RNAlater can effectively preserve proteins up to 6 h after incubation, supporting its use in the field. Subsequently, we collected arm tips from wild-caught Octopus berrima and preserved them in homemade RNAlater immediately, 3 h, and 6 h after euthanasia. Processed tissue samples were analysed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to ascertain protein differences between time delay in tissue preservation, as well as the influence of sex, tissue type, and tissue homogenisation methods. Over 3500 proteins were identified from all tissues, with bioinformatic analysis revealing protein abundances were largely consistent regardless of sample treatment. However, nearly 10% additional proteins were detected from tissues homogenised with metal beads compared to liquid nitrogen methods, indicating the beads were more efficient at extracting proteins. Our optimised workflow demonstrates that sampling non-model organisms from remote field sites is achievable and can facilitate extensive proteomic coverage without compromising protein integrity.

Indexed as

OctopodiformesAnimalsChromatography, LiquidComputational BiologyElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFixativesProteomicsFixatives

Identifiers

PMID37437086
PMCPMC10337964
OpenAlexW4384008206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.