Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Interventions towards barriers to the practice of physical activity in adolescence: A systematic review protocol.

Lauryane Fonseca Terra, Woska Pires da Costa, Regina Márcia Ferreira Silva, Leonardo Mateus Teixeira de Rezende, Matias Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions on Barriers to the Participation of Adolescents in Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lauryane Fonseca TerraInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-2116
Woska Pires da CostaInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.
Regina Márcia Ferreira SilvaInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-0020
Leonardo Mateus Teixeira de RezendeInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.
Matias NollInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1482-0718
Priscilla Rayanne E Silva NollInstituto Federal Goiano-Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil.
Ceres · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLack of regular physical activity is recognized as a global public health issue. Three out of every four adolescents do not adhere to physical activity recommendations. Thus, this systematic review will evaluate interventions employed to minimize barriers to physical activity among adolescents. Herein, we present the study protocol. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review to assess the interventions implemented to minimize barriers to the practice of physical activity among adolescents. A systematic understanding of the most effective interventions to reduce the barriers to physical activity is essential. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will search five databases: two multidisciplinary (Scopus and Web of Science) and three other health-related databases (Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed). The search will be limited to original peer-reviewed articles published in English, with no time restrictions. The search strategy will use MeSH terms and their variations to maximize the search strategy. Two reviewers will independently read the included articles, extract the data, and evaluate the methodological quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scale and the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and Downs and Black scale. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. This systematic review will follow the guidelines outlined in the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study are expected to enhance the current understanding of the obstacles to physical activity among adolescents and aid in the development or modification of programs to combat physical inactivity in this population. Consequently, these findings should have a positive impact on current and future adolescent health outcomes. ETHICS AND DISCLOSURE: Ethical approval will not be required for this study as it is an analysis of previously published articles (i.e., secondary data). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022382174.

Indexed as

ChecklistExerciseAdolescentDatabases, FactualHumansInterdisciplinary StudiesKnowledgeSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37437054
PMCPMC10337968
OpenAlexW4384008756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.