Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437026›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The investigation of constraints in implementing robust AI colorectal polyp detection for sustainable healthcare system.

Haitao Bian, Min Jiang, Jingjing Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research progress on colorectal cancer identification based on convolutional neural network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haitao BianCollege of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0652-3414
Min JiangKLA Corporation, Milpitas, California, United States of America.
Jingjing QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-7778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the significant threats to public health and the sustainable healthcare system during urbanization. As the primary method of screening, colonoscopy can effectively detect polyps before they evolve into cancerous growths. However, the current visual inspection by endoscopists is insufficient in providing consistently reliable polyp detection for colonoscopy videos and images in CRC screening. Artificial Intelligent (AI) based object detection is considered as a potent solution to overcome visual inspection limitations and mitigate human errors in colonoscopy. This study implemented a YOLOv5 object detection model to investigate the performance of mainstream one-stage approaches in colorectal polyp detection. Meanwhile, a variety of training datasets and model structure configurations are employed to identify the determinative factors in practical applications. The designed experiments show that the model yields acceptable results assisted by transfer learning, and highlight that the primary constraint in implementing deep learning polyp detection comes from the scarcity of training data. The model performance was improved by 15.6% in terms of average precision (AP) when the original training dataset was expanded. Furthermore, the experimental results were analysed from a clinical perspective to identify potential causes of false positives. Besides, the quality management framework is proposed for future dataset preparation and model development in AI-driven polyp detection tasks for smart healthcare solutions.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsArtificial IntelligenceColonoscopyHealth FacilitiesHumansMainstreaming, Education

Identifiers

PMID37437026
PMCPMC10337963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.