ArticlePloS one2023
The investigation of constraints in implementing robust AI colorectal polyp detection for sustainable healthcare system.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Research progress on colorectal cancer identification based on convolutional neural network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Review
- Intraoperative near infrared functional imaging of rectal cancer using artificial intelligence methods - now and near future state of the art.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the significant threats to public health and the sustainable healthcare system during urbanization. As the primary method of screening, colonoscopy can effectively detect polyps before they evolve into cancerous growths. However, the current visual inspection by endoscopists is insufficient in providing consistently reliable polyp detection for colonoscopy videos and images in CRC screening. Artificial Intelligent (AI) based object detection is considered as a potent solution to overcome visual inspection limitations and mitigate human errors in colonoscopy. This study implemented a YOLOv5 object detection model to investigate the performance of mainstream one-stage approaches in colorectal polyp detection. Meanwhile, a variety of training datasets and model structure configurations are employed to identify the determinative factors in practical applications. The designed experiments show that the model yields acceptable results assisted by transfer learning, and highlight that the primary constraint in implementing deep learning polyp detection comes from the scarcity of training data. The model performance was improved by 15.6% in terms of average precision (AP) when the original training dataset was expanded. Furthermore, the experimental results were analysed from a clinical perspective to identify potential causes of false positives. Besides, the quality management framework is proposed for future dataset preparation and model development in AI-driven polyp detection tasks for smart healthcare solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.