Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437022›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Towards a barrier-free anthropomorphic brain phantom for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: Design, first construction attempt, and challenges.

Mikail Kraft, Slavka Ryger, Ben P Berman, Matthew E Downs, Kalina V Jordanova, Megan E Poorman, Samuel D Oberdick, Stephen E Ogier, Stephen E Russek, Joseph Dagher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mikail KraftNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-5945
Slavka RygerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Ben P BermanThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia, United States of America.
Matthew E DownsThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia, United States of America.
Kalina V JordanovaNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Megan E PoormanHyperfine, Inc, Guilford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Samuel D OberdickNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Stephen E OgierNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-1693
Stephen E RussekNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Joseph DagherThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia, United States of America.
Kathryn E KeenanNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Measurement Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-5255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reference objects, or phantoms, are typically constructed from simple liquid or gel solutions in containers with specific geometric configurations to enable multi-year stability. However, there is a need for phantoms that better mimic the human anatomy without barriers between the tissues. Barriers result in regions without MRI signal between the different tissue mimics, which is an artificial image artifact. We created an anatomically representative 3D structure of the brain that mimicked the T1 and T2 relaxation properties of white and gray matter at 3 T. While the goal was to avoid barriers between tissues, the 3D printed barrier between white and gray matter and other flaws in the construction were visible at 3 T. Stability measurements were made using a portable MRI system operating at 64 mT, and T2 relaxation time was stable from 0 to 22 weeks. The phantom T1 relaxation properties did change from 0 to 10 weeks; however, they did not substantially change between 10 weeks and 22 weeks. The anthropomorphic phantom used a dissolvable mold construction method to better mimic anatomy, which worked in small test objects. The construction process, though, had many challenges. We share this work with the hope that the community can build on our experience.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID37437022
PMCPMC10337967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.