Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37437012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Evidence and clinical relevance of maternal-fetal cardiac coupling: A scoping review.

Thomas J Nichting, Maretha Bester, Rohan Joshi, Massimo Mischi, Myrthe van der Ven, Daisy A A van der Woude, S Guid Oei, Judith O E H van Laar, Rik Vullings

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J NichtingDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-4380
Maretha BesterDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Rohan JoshiDepartment of Patient Care and Monitoring, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Massimo MischiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Myrthe van der VenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Daisy A A van der WoudeDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
S Guid OeiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Judith O E H van LaarDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Rik VullingsDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-6098
X Flow (Netherlands) · NLPhilips (Netherlands) · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLNemo Healthcare (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers have long suspected a mutual interaction between maternal and fetal heart rhythms, referred to as maternal-fetal cardiac coupling (MFCC). While several studies have been published on this phenomenon, they vary in terms of methodologies, populations assessed, and definitions of coupling. Moreover, a clear discussion of the potential clinical implications is often lacking. Subsequently, we perform a scoping review to map the current state of the research in this field and, by doing so, form a foundation for future clinically oriented research on this topic.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Filters were only set for language (English, Dutch, and German literature were included) and not for year of publication. After screening for the title and the abstract, a full-text evaluation of eligibility followed. All studies on MFCC were included which described coupling between heart rate measurements in both the mother and fetus, regardless of the coupling method used, gestational age, or the maternal or fetal health condition.

results23 studies remained after a systematic evaluation of 6,672 studies. Of these, 21 studies found at least occasional instances of MFCC. Methods used to capture MFCC are synchrograms and corresponding phase coherence indices, cross-correlation, joint symbolic dynamics, transfer entropy, bivariate phase rectified signal averaging, and deep coherence. Physiological pathways regulating MFCC are suggested to exist either via the autonomic nervous system or due to the vibroacoustic effect, though neither of these suggested pathways has been verified. The strength and direction of MFCC are found to change with gestational age and with the rate of maternal breathing, while also being further altered in fetuses with cardiac abnormalities and during labor.

conclusionFrom the synthesis of the available literature on MFCC presented in this scoping review, it seems evident that MFCC does indeed exist and may have clinical relevance in tracking fetal well-being and development during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Clinical RelevanceFetusFemaleGestational AgeHeartHumansPregnancyPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID37437012
PMCPMC10337870
OpenAlexW4384025331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.