Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436790›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

The Building Healthy Eating and Self-Esteem Together for University Students Mobile App to Treat Eating Disorders: User-Centered Research Design and Feasibility Study.

Kelsie T Forbush, Kara A Christensen Pacella, Marianna L Thomeczek, Sara R Gould, Danielle A N Chapa, Brianne N Richson, Victoria L Perko, Joseph Ayres, Yiyang Chen, Sonakshi Negi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsie T ForbushDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-4204
Kara A Christensen PacellaDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-0570
Marianna L ThomeczekDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7098-8697
Sara R GouldDepartment of Developmental and Behavioral Health, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-3516
Danielle A N ChapaDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-4194
Brianne N RichsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0812-6500
Victoria L PerkoReefPoint Group, LLC, Tysons, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-6363
Joseph AyresDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-671X
Yiyang ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-3028
Sonakshi NegiDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8277-2962
University of Kansas · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002368 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jennifer Lynn Goldman, NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversity students are an at-risk group for the development of eating disorders (EDs); however, many college campuses lack sufficient resources to provide ED specialty care. Students report unique reasons for not seeking ED treatment, including the desire to solve the problem on their own (eg, seeking help from friends, self-medicating, or waiting to see if their problems improve), inability to afford treatment, lack of time to participate in the treatment, fear of seeing their primary care physician, and lack of recognition of their issues as an ED. Mobile health (mHealth) apps may be a cost-effective, helpful adjunctive tool to overcome personal and systemic barriers and encourage help seeking.

objectiveThis paper describes the development, usability, and acceptability of the Building Healthy Eating and Self-Esteem Together for University Students (BEST-U) mHealth smartphone app, which is designed to fill critical gaps in access to ED treatment on college campuses.

methodsWe undertook a 4-phase iterative development process that focused on user-centered design. The 4 phases included needs assessment based on literature reviews, prototype development and initial evaluation in a pilot trial, redesign, and further pilot-testing to assess the usability and acceptability of the final version of the mHealth app. Acceptability and user satisfaction were assessed using an ad hoc survey that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

resultsOur needs assessment identified a lack of accessible and affordable treatments for university students. To help meet this need, the BEST-U prototype was designed as an 11-week program that provided interactive, weekly modules that focused on second- and third-wave cognitive behavioral skills. The modules focused on topics such as psychoeducation, reducing thought distortions and body checking, improving body image, interpersonal effectiveness, and behavior chain analysis. The content included interactive quizzes, short answer questions, daily and weekly logs, and surveys completed in the app. BEST-U was paired with brief 25-30 minutes of weekly telehealth coaching sessions provided by a licensed provider or supervised trainee. Pilot-testing revealed minor issues with one module of the app content, which some participants viewed as having low relevance to their experience and therapist concerns about the organization of the app content. These issues were addressed through the removal, addition, and reorganization of BEST-U modules, with the help of therapists-in-training across 2 workshops. The revised version of the BEST-U app had a grand mean acceptability rating of 5.73 out of 7. The participants completed 90.1% (694/770) of the BEST-U modules, indicating high compliance.

conclusionsBEST-U is a new, acceptable, and user-friendly mHealth app to help therapists deliver brief, evidence-based cognitive behavioral interventions. Owing to its acceptability and user-friendly nature, BEST-U has high user compliance and holds promise for future implementation and dissemination in university mental health settings.

Indexed as

acceptabilityappBEST-UBuilding Healthy Eating and Self-Esteem Together for University Studentscognitivecognitive behavioral therapycollegedesigndevelopmentdialectical behavioral therapyeating disordersEDsguided self-helpmental healthmHealthmobile healthmobile phonestudentstestingtherapytreatmentuniversityusability

Identifiers

PMID37436790
PMCPMC10372766
OpenAlexW4366322495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.