Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436789›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2023

Using Health-Related Social Media to Understand the Experiences of Adults With Lung Cancer in the Era of Immuno-Oncology and Targeted Therapies: Observational Study.

Alison Booth, Stephanie Manson, Sonia Halhol, Evie Merinopoulou, Mireia Raluy-Callado, Asha Hareendran, Stefanie Knoll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison BoothData Analytics, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7977-9621
Stephanie MansonHealth Economics, Outcomes Research (HEOR), Novartis Oncology, East Hanover, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-9285
Sonia HalholData Analytics, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-2242
Evie MerinopoulouData Analytics, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6677-2105
Mireia Raluy-CalladoData Analytics, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7265-7879
Asha HareendranData Analytics, Evidera, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4608-9747
Stefanie KnollHealth Economics, Outcomes Research (HEOR), Novartis Oncology, East Hanover, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved dramatically with the approval of immuno-oncology (IO) and targeted therapies (TTs). Insights on the patient experience with these therapies and their impacts are lacking. Health-related social media has been increasingly used by patients to share their disease and treatment experiences, thus representing a valuable source of real-world data to understand the patient's voice and uncover potential unmet needs.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the experiences of patients with NSCLC as reported in discussions posted on lung cancer-specific social media with respect to their disease symptoms and associated impacts.

methodsPublicly available posts (2010-2019) were extracted from selected lung cancer- or NSCLC-specific websites. Social media users (patients and caregivers posting on these websites) were stratified by metastatic- and adjuvant-eligible subgroups and treatment received using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning methods. Automated identification of symptoms was conducted using NLP. Qualitative data analysis (QDA) was conducted on random samples of posts mentioning pain-related, fatigue-related, respiratory-related, or infection-related symptoms to capture the patient experience with these and associated impacts.

resultsOverall, 1724 users (50,390 posts) and 574 users (4531 posts) were included in the metastatic group and adjuvant group, respectively. Among users in the metastatic group, pain, discomfort, and fatigue were the most commonly mentioned symptoms (49.7% and 39.6%, respectively), and in the QDA (258 posts from 134 users), the most frequent impacts related to physical impairments, sleep, and eating habits. Among users in the adjuvant group, pain, discomfort, and respiratory symptoms were the most commonly mentioned (44.8% and 23.9%, respectively), and impacts identified in the QDA (154 posts from 92 users) were mostly related to physical functioning.

conclusionsFindings from this exploratory observational analysis of social media among patients and caregivers informed the lived experience of NSCLC in the era of novel therapies, shedding light on most reported symptoms and their impacts. These findings can be used to inform future research on NSCLC treatment development and patient management.

Indexed as

data scienceimmunotherapylung cancermachine learningnatural language processingnon-small cell lung cancerpatient experiencepatient preferencesocial mediasocial media datatargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID37436789
PMCPMC10372558
OpenAlexW4361002794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.