Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436593›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review.

Alvaro Sanabria, María Paula Olivera, Carlos Chiesa-Estomba, Marc Hamoir, Luiz P Kowalski, Fernando López, Antti Mäkitie, K Thomas Robbins, Juan Pablo Rodrigo, Cesare Piazza and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Stapler-assisted total laryngectomy and hybrid primary puncture: analysis of functional results.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Alvaro SanabriaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia/Hospital Alma Mater, Cra. 51d #62-29, Medellín, Colombia. alvarosanabria@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-8840
María Paula OliveraDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia/Hospital Alma Mater, Cra. 51d #62-29, Medellín, Colombia.
Carlos Chiesa-EstombaOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastian, Guipuzkoa-Basque Country, Spain.
Marc HamoirDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, UC Louvain, St Luc University Hospital and King Albert II Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Luiz P KowalskiHead and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A C Camargo Cancer Center, and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando LópezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Antti MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, and the Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
K Thomas RobbinsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Juan Pablo RodrigoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Cesare PiazzaUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Ashok ShahaHead and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Elizabeth SjögrenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carlos SuarezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Mark ZafereoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alfio FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35125, Padua, Italy.
Universidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidad de Antioquia · COLeiden University Medical Center · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe most common early postoperative complication after total laryngectomy (TL) is pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Rates of PCF are higher in patients who undergo salvage TL compared with primary TL. Published meta-analyses include heterogeneous studies making the conclusions difficult to interpret. The objectives of this scoping review were to explore the reconstructive techniques potentially available for primary TL and to clarify which could be the best technique for each clinical scenario.

methodsA list of available reconstructive techniques for primary TL was built and the potential comparisons between techniques were identified. A PubMed literature search was performed from inception to August 2022. Only case-control, comparative cohort, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included.

resultsA meta-analysis of seven original studies showed a PCF risk difference (RD) of 14% (95% CI 8-20%) favoring stapler closure over manual suture. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, we could not find statistically significant differences in PCF risk between primary vertical suture and T-shaped suture. Evidence for other pharyngeal closure alternatives is scarce.

conclusionWe could not identify differences in the rate of PCF between continuous and T-shape suture configuration. Stapler closure seems to be followed by a lower rate of PCF than manual suture in those patients that are good candidates for this technique.

Indexed as

Cutaneous FistulaLaryngeal NeoplasmsPharyngeal DiseasesPlastic Surgery ProceduresHumansLaryngectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesLaryngectomyMeta-analysisReconstructionSutureSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37436593
PMCPMC10427525
OpenAlexW4383998495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.