Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436589›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2023

Sedation with a 1:1 mixture of etomidate and propofol for gastroscopy in hypertensive elderly patients.

Yanpeng Liu, Yiping Huang, Ruoguo Wang, Yongji Zhai, Kechang Huang, Zhanjie Ren

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanpeng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yiping HuangDepartment of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Ruoguo WangDepartment of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongji ZhaiDepartment of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Kechang HuangDepartment of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhanjie RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-1955-326X
Weifang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesized that the combined use of etomidate and propofol for endoscopic sedation in elderly hypertensive patients could reduce adverse reactions while providing ideal sedation. To validate our hypothesis, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. A total of 360 elderly hypertensive patients scheduled for gastroscopy at our hospital were enrolled in the study, of whom 328 completed the trial. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the propofol group (group P), the etomidate group (group E), or the propofol-etomidate combination group (mixed at a ratio of 1:1, group PE). We collected and analyzed the cardiopulmonary effects and side effects in each group. Regardless of the sedation drug used, the systolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate of involved patients were significantly affected. Oxygen desaturation and injection pain were more common in group P compared to groups E (33.6% vs. 14.8%, 31.8% vs. 2.7%, both P < 0.01) and group PE (33.6% vs. 13.6%, 31.8% vs. 6.4%, both P < 0.01). The incidence of myoclonus in the PE group was lower than that in the E group (10.9% vs. 61.2%, P < 0.01). Our results indeed demonstrated that the combined use of etomidate and propofol appeared to maintain cardiopulmonary stability with minimal side effects in older hypertensive patients scheduled for gastroscopy, which further implied that this sedation strategy could be a safe and pain-free option for managing patients undergoing gastroscopy, particularly those at a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

EtomidateHypertensionPropofolAgedAnesthetics, IntravenousGastroscopyHumansProspective StudiesAnesthetics, IntravenousEtomidatePropofolelderlyetomidategastroscopyhypertensionpropofolsedation

Identifiers

PMID37436589
PMCPMC10423762
OpenAlexW4383998207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.