Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436564›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

Considering the Influence of Coronary Motion on Artery-Specific Biomechanics Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation.

Nicholas A T Fogell, Miten Patel, Pan Yang, Roosje M Ruis, David B Garcia, Jarka Naser, Fotios Savvopoulos, Clint Davies Taylor, Anouk L Post, Ryan M Pedrigi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicholas A T FogellNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK. n.fogell@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-575X
Miten PatelNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Pan YangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Roosje M RuisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
David B GarciaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Jarka NaserNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Fotios SavvopoulosNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Clint Davies TaylorSimulia, Dassault Systemes UK Ltd, Knutsford, UK.
Anouk L PostAmsterdam UMC, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ryan M PedrigiMechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USA.
Ranil de Silva *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Guy Scadding Building, Cale Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Rob Krams *School for Material Sciences and Engineering, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDassault Systèmes (United Kingdom) · GBLung Institute · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP/17/1/32702Medical Research Council MR/R502352/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endothelium in the coronary arteries is subject to wall shear stress and vessel wall strain, which influences the biology of the arterial wall. This study presents vessel-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models of three coronary arteries, using directly measured experimental geometries and boundary conditions. FSI models are used to provide a more physiologically complete representation of vessel biomechanics, and have been extended to include coronary bending to investigate its effect on shear and strain. FSI both without- and with-bending resulted in significant changes in all computed shear stress metrics compared to CFD (p = 0.0001). Inclusion of bending within the FSI model produced highly significant changes in Time Averaged Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS) + 9.8% LAD, + 8.8% LCx, - 2.0% RCA; Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI) + 208% LAD, 0% LCx, + 2600% RCA; and transverse wall Shear Stress (tSS) + 180% LAD, + 150% LCx and + 200% RCA (all p < 0.0001). Vessel wall strain was homogenous in all directions without-bending but became highly anisotropic under bending. Changes in median cyclic strain magnitude were seen for all three vessels in every direction. Changes shown in the magnitude and distribution of shear stress and wall strain suggest that bending should be considered on a vessel-specific basis in analyses of coronary artery biomechanics.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsModels, CardiovascularBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHeartHemodynamicsStress, MechanicalComputational fluid dynamicsCoronary bendingCoronary biomechanicsEndothelial strainShear stress

Identifiers

PMID37436564
PMCPMC10409843
OpenAlexW4383998987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.