Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436557›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Pain assessment in autism: updating the ethical and methodological challenges through a state-of-the-art review.

Valentina Nicolardi, Isabella Fanizza, Giuseppe Accogli, Luigi Macchitella, Sara Scoditti, Antonio Trabacca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Reliable Effect of Alexithymia, but Not Autism, on Placebo Hypoalgesia.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina NicolardiUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-7294
Isabella FanizzaUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-8345
Giuseppe AccogliUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-7395
Luigi MacchitellaUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7749-2435
Sara ScodittiUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-7124
Antonio TrabaccaUnit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute IRCCS "E. Medea", Ex Complesso Ospedaliero "A. Di Summa" - Piazza "A. Di Summa", 72100, Brindisi, Italy. antonio.trabacca@lanostrafamiglia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-0105
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIRCCS Eugenio Medea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory features of autism include hypo- or hyper-reactivity to pain; however, previous studies on pain in autism lead to conflicting results. Here, we present the state of the art and the methodological challenges concerning pain perception in autism, focusing on studies that used standardized protocol as Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) to measure perception. Despite there are still scant evidences found with the use of QST, they have challenged the presumed hyposensitivity to pain in autisms, which emerged from parents' reports. Both, peripheral and central mechanisms, have been found involved in typical features of perception in autism. Nonetheless, evidences with controlled protocols are still scarce, and even scarcer are studies focused on children. Overall, complex ethical challenges have to be overcome in order to collect subjective and objective measures from autistic children. With heterogeneous neurodevelopmental features, or intellectual disability, novel or modified protocols are needed.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderChildHumansPainPain MeasurementPain PerceptionParentsAutismNeurodevelopmentPainQuantitative Sensory Testing (QST)Sensory processing

Identifiers

PMID37436557
OpenAlexW4383998419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.