Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Identification and validation of a plasma metabolomics-based model for risk stratification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of albumin-bilirubin grade in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Relationships between immune cells, blood metabolites, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Mendelian randomization study with experimental validation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Predictive Modeling and Mendelian Randomization for Identifying HCC Patients with High Response to TACE with Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Advances in Multi-Omics Research on Biomarkers of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Biomarkers and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: Unveiling New Horizons for Precision Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Factors Contributing to the High Malignancy Level of Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Epidemiology: Literature Review and Data.Biology · 2025Review
- The Search for Risk, Diagnostic, and Prognostic Biomarkers of Cholangiocarcinoma and Their Biological and Clinicopathologic Significance.The American journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Metabolomics profiling identifies diagnostic metabolic signatures for pregnancy loss: a cross-sectional study from northwestern China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review for clinicians.Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
- Interplay of Cardiometabolic Syndrome and Biliary Tract Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis with Gender-Specific Insights.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiver resection is the mainstay of curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) while the postoperative prognosis varies greatly, with no recognized biomarker. We aimed to identify the plasma metabolomic biomarkers that could be used for preoperative risk stratification of ICC patients.
methods108 eligible ICC patients who underwent radical surgical resection between August 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into a discovery cohort (n = 76) and a validation cohort (n = 32) by 7:3. Metabolomics profiling of preoperative plasma was performed and clinical data were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to screen and validate the survival-related metabolic biomarker panel and construct a LASSO-Cox prediction model.
results10 survival-related metabolic biomarkers were used for construction of a LASSO-Cox prediction model. In the discovery and validation cohorts, the LASSO-Cox prediction model achieved an AUC of 0.876 (95%CI: 0.777-0.974) and 0.860 (95%CI: 0.711-1.000) in evaluating 1-year OS of ICC patients, respectively. The OS of ICC patients in the high-risk group was significantly worse than that in the low-risk group (discovery cohort, p < 0.0001; validation cohort: p = 0.041). Also, the LASSO-Cox risk score (HR 2.43, 95%CI: 1.81-3.26, p < 0.0001) was a significant independent risk factor associated with OS.
conclusionsThe LASSO-Cox prediction model has potential as an important tool in evaluating the OS of ICC patients after surgical resection and can be used as prediction tools to implement the best treatment options that could result in better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.