Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436446›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2023

Access to device-aided therapies in advanced Parkinson's disease: navigating clinician biases, patient preference, and prognostic uncertainty.

Manon Auffret, Daniel Weiss, Fabrizio Stocchi, Marc Vérin, Wolfgang H Jost

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frailty in Parkinson's disease: time to integrate it into treatment decision-making?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  6. What's in a name? reframing advanced Parkinson's disease as a multidimensional state.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Advanced Therapeutics in Parkinson's Disease: What's New?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Manon AuffretFrance Développement Electronique (FDE), Monswiller, France. auffret.manon@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7003-4084
Daniel WeissCentre for Neurology, Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabrizio StocchiUniversity San Raffaele Roma and Institute of Research and Medical Care IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy.
Marc VérinInstitut des Neurosciences Cliniques de Rennes (INCR), Rennes, France.
Wolfgang H JostParkinson-Klinik Ortenau, Kreuzbergstr. 12-16, 77709, Wolfach, Germany.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEInstitut des Neurosciences Cliniques de Rennes · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITLaboratoire de Biologie du Développement · FRParkinson-Klinik Ortenau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Device-aided therapies (DAT), which include deep brain stimulation and pump-based continuous dopaminergic stimulation with either levodopa or apomorphine, are among the major advances in the clinical management of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although DAT are being increasingly offered earlier in the disease course, their classical indication remains advanced PD. Theoretically, every patient should be offered transition to DAT when faced with refractory motor and nonmotor fluctuations and functional decline. Worldwide clinical reality is far from these ideal, and, therefore, question the "real-world" equal opportunity of access to DAT for PD patients with advanced PD-even within a single health care system. Differences in access to care, referral pattern (timing and frequency), as well as physician biases (unconscious/implicit or conscious/explicit bias), and patients' preferences or health-seeking behaviour are to be considered. Compared to DBS, little information is available concerning infusion therapies, as well as neurologists' and patients' attitudes towards them. This viewpoint aims to be thought-provoking and to assist clinicians in moving through the process of DAT selection, by including in their decision algorithm their own biases, patient perspective, ethical concerns as well as the current unknowns surrounding PD prognosis and DAT-related long-term side effects for a given patient.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsHumansLevodopaPatient PreferencePrognosisUncertaintyAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopaClinician biasDevice-aided therapiesParkinson’s diseasePatient preferencePersonalised medicine

Identifiers

PMID37436446
PMCPMC10645670
OpenAlexW4383998218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.