Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37436283›Full record

ArticleRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2023

Evaluation of konjac noodle as a microsurgery training model: learning curve analysis.

Tiago Marques Avelar, Renan Maximilian Lovato, Thiago Gomes Barbosa, Paulo Adolfo Wessel Xander, Leonardo Henrique DA Silva Rodrigues, Adriana Jose Brito Campos, Ricardo Salemi Riechelmann, Juan Antonio Castro Flores, Guilherme Brasileiro DE Aguiar, Jean Gonçalves DE Oliveira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tiago Marques Avelar-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-5815
Renan Maximilian Lovato-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-008X
Thiago Gomes Barbosa-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-4574
Paulo Adolfo Wessel Xander-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-3631
Leonardo Henrique DA Silva Rodrigues-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-5167
Adriana Jose Brito Campos-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-813X
Ricardo Salemi Riechelmann-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-7702
Juan Antonio Castro Flores-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-7989
Guilherme Brasileiro DE Aguiar-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3206-2081
Jean Gonçalves DE Oliveira-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7274-7715
José Carlos Esteves Veiga-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Divisão de Neurocirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-4396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundclassical models of microsurgical anastomosis training are expensive and have ethical implications. Some alternatives join low cost and easiness to store. However, the translation of knowledge acquired by training in these methods into the traditional ones is not clear. This project aims to assess the feasibility of konjac noodles as a reliable microsurgery-training model.

methods10 neurosurgery residents performed an end-to-end anastomosis in a 2-3mm placenta artery. The anastomoses were evaluated quantitatively, recording time; and qualitatively, applying a validated score (Anastomosis Lapse Index - ALI) by three experienced neurosurgeons and verifying the presence of gross leakage through the infusion of fluorescein. Subsequently, they performed 10 non-consecutive sessions of anastomosis training in the konjac noodle. Eventually, a final anastomosis in the placenta model was performed and the same parameters were scored.

resultswe observed a 17min reduction in the mean time to perform the anastomosis in the placenta model after the training in the konjac (p<0.05). There was a non-significant 20% reduction in gross leakage, but the training sessions were not able to consistently improve the ALI score.

conclusionswe demonstrate a reduction in anastomosis performing time in placental arteries after training sessions in the konjac noodle model, which can be regarded as a feasible low-cost method, particularly useful in centers with surgical microscopes only in the operation room.

Indexed as

AmorphophallusAnastomosis, SurgicalArteriesClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansLearning CurveMicrosurgeryPlacentaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37436283
PMCPMC10508674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.