ArticleACS sensors2023
Analysis of Nanopore Data: Classification Strategies for an Unbiased Curation of Single-Molecule Events from DNA Nanostructures.
Article in ACS sensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous, Low Latency Estimation of the Size and Shape of Single Proteins from Real-Time Nanopore Data.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Constructing a Nanopipette-Based DNA Electromechanical Device.Nano letters · 2025Article
- Supramolecular Interactions Modulate RNA:DNA Folding Observed via Nanopore Sensing.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Solid-State Nanopore Readout of Programmable DNA and Peptide Nanostructures for Scalable Digital Data Storage.Biosensors · 2025Article
- A Robust Parallel Computing Data Extraction Framework for Nanopore Experiments.Small methods · 2024Article
- Analysis of Nanopore Data: Classification Strategies for an Unbiased Curation of Single-Molecule Events from DNA Nanostructures.ACS sensors · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopores are versatile single-molecule sensors that are being used to sense increasingly complex mixtures of structured molecules with applications in molecular data storage and disease biomarker detection. However, increased molecular complexity presents additional challenges to the analysis of nanopore data, including more translocation events being rejected for not matching an expected signal structure and a greater risk of selection bias entering this event curation process. To highlight these challenges, here, we present the analysis of a model molecular system consisting of a nanostructured DNA molecule attached to a linear DNA carrier. We make use of recent advances in the event segmentation capabilities of Nanolyzer, a graphical analysis tool provided for nanopore event fitting, and describe approaches to the event substructure analysis. In the process, we identify and discuss important sources of selection bias that emerge in the analysis of this molecular system and consider the complicating effects of molecular conformation and variable experimental conditions (e.g., pore diameter). We then present additional refinements to existing analysis techniques, allowing for improved separation of multiplexed samples, fewer translocation events rejected as false negatives, and a wider range of experimental conditions for which accurate molecular information can be extracted. Increasing the coverage of analyzed events within nanopore data is not only important for characterizing complex molecular samples with high fidelity but is also becoming essential to the generation of accurate, unbiased training data as machine-learning approaches to data analysis and event identification continue to increase in prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.