ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2023
Validation of the Turkish version of Endometriosis Health Profile questionnaire (EHP-30) to evaluate the quality of life in women with endometriosis.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between the Age at Menarche, Time to Diagnosis, and Disease Severity Assessed Using the rASRM and #ENZIAN Classifications in Patients Diagnosed with Advanced Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Pain Intensity in Different Locations and Intraoperative Stage of Endometriosis According to rASRM and #ENZIAN Classification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Exome-Based Identification of Candidate Genes in Sporadic Adenomyosis Cases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Serum miR-141-3p serves as a biomarker for early-stage diagnosis of endometriosis.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Quality of Life Assessment and Clinical Implications for Women with Endometriosis Through Validated Tools: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients' Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause-Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) is a commonly used tool for assessing the impact of endometriosis on a person's quality of life. The EHP-30 is a 30-item questionnaire that measures various aspects of endometriosis-related health, including physical symptoms, emotional well-being, and functional impairment. Objectives: EHP-30 has not yet been evaluated with Turkish patients. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate the Turkish version of EHP-30 in this study. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 281 randomly selected patients from Turkish Endometriosis Patient-Support Groups. The items of the EHP-30 distributed across 5 subscales of the core questionnaire are generally applicable to all women with endometriosis. There are 11 items on the pain scale, 6 on the control and powerlessness scale, 4 on the social support scale, 6 on the emotional well-being scale, and 3 on the self-image scale. The patients were asked to complete the form with brief demographic information and psychometric evaluation included factor analysis, convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, data completeness and the determination of floor and ceiling effects. Main outcome measure: The main outcomes measures were the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and the assessment of construct validity. Results: In this study, 281 completed questionnaires were included with a return rate of 91%. Data completeness was accepted as excellent on all subscales. Floor effects were found in medical profession (37%), children (32%) and work (31%) modules. No ceiling effects were found. Division of the core questionnaire into five subscales identical to the original EHP-30 was confirmed by factor analysis performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement varied from 0.822 to 0.914. There was agreement between the EHP-30 and EQ-5D-3L on both of the hypotheses that were tested. There was a statistically significant difference in scores between endometriosis patients and healthy women across in all subscales (p<.01). Conclusion: The results of this validation study for the EHP-30 indicated a high level of data completeness, with no significant floor or ceiling effects. The questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. These findings confirm that the Turkish version of the EHP-30 is a valid and reliable toolfor measuring the health-related quality of life in individuals with endometriosis. What's new?: EHP-30 had not yet been evaluated with Turkish patients and the results of this study demonstrate the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the EHP-30 in assessing endometriosis patients' health-related quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.