ArticleAnnals of medicine2023
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of mild-moderate COVID-19 using haematological markers.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid EfficientNet B4 and SVM framework for rapid and accurate bone cancer diagnosis from X-rays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-based clinical prediction model for early infectious disease classification in the emergency department.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Machine learning glucose forecasting models for septic patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multifractal analysis and support vector machine for the classification of coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 variants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning approach for optimizing usability of healthcare websites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma survival with artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decision tree-based learning and laboratory data mining: an efficient approach to amebiasis testing.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and prediction of COVID-19 in cough audio signals using coronavirus herd immunity optimizer algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model of angiogenesis-related genes in multiple myeloma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Integrative genomic analysis of the lung tissue microenvironment in SARS-CoV-2 and NL63 patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence and machine learning: novel approaches to face infectious diseases challenges.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe persistent spread of SARS-CoV-2 makes diagnosis challenging because COVID-19 symptoms are hard to differentiate from those of other respiratory illnesses. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test is the current golden standard for diagnosing various respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. However, this standard diagnostic method is prone to erroneous and false negative results (10% -15%). Therefore, finding an alternative technique to validate the RT-PCR test is paramount. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications are extensively used in medical research. Hence, this study focused on developing a decision support system using AI to diagnose mild-moderate COVID-19 from other similar diseases using demographic and clinical markers. Severe COVID-19 cases were not considered in this study since fatality rates have dropped considerably after introducing COVID-19 vaccines.
methodsA custom stacked ensemble model consisting of various heterogeneous algorithms has been utilized for prediction. Four deep learning algorithms have also been tested and compared, such as one-dimensional convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory networks, deep neural networks and Residual Multi-Layer Perceptron. Five explainers, namely, Shapley Additive Values, Eli5, QLattice, Anchor and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations, have been utilized to interpret the predictions made by the classifiers.
resultsAfter using Pearson's correlation and particle swarm optimization feature selection, the final stack obtained a maximum accuracy of 89%. The most important markers which were useful in COVID-19 diagnosis are Eosinophil, Albumin, T. Bilirubin, ALP, ALT, AST, HbA1c and TWBC.
conclusionThe promising results suggest using this decision support system to diagnose COVID-19 from other similar respiratory illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.