Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37435785›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023

Explainable machine learning model for predicting skeletal muscle loss during surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Wen-Han Hsu, Ai-Tung Ko, Chia-Sui Weng, Chih-Long Chang, Ya-Ting Jan, Jhen-Bin Lin, Hung-Ju Chien, Wan-Chun Lin, Fang-Ju Sun, Kun-Pin Wu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Machine learning for predicting muscle loss after radiotherapy using clinical and toxicity data in oral cavity cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The predictive value ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Han HsuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ai-Tung KoInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Sui WengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Long ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ya-Ting JanDepartment of Radiology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jhen-Bin LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Hung-Ju ChienDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wan-Chun LinInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fang-Ju SunInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kun-Pin WuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jie LeeDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-2393
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWChanghua Christian Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkeletal muscle loss during treatment is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. Although changes in muscle mass can be assessed on computed tomography (CT) scans, this labour-intensive process can impair its utility in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict muscle loss based on clinical data and to interpret the ML model by applying SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.

methodsThis study included the data of 617 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy at a tertiary centre between 2010 and 2019. The cohort data were split into training and test sets based on the treatment time. External validation was performed using 140 patients from a different tertiary centre. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured from pre- and post-treatment CT scans, and a decrease in SMI ≥ 5% was defined as muscle loss. We evaluated five ML models to predict muscle loss, and their performance was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 score. The features for analysis included demographic and disease-specific characteristics and relative changes in body mass index (BMI), albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The SHAP method was applied to determine the importance of the features and interpret the ML models.

resultsThe median (inter-quartile range) age of the cohort was 52 (46-59) years. After treatment, 204 patients (33.1%) experienced muscle loss in the training and test datasets, while 44 (31.4%) patients experienced muscle loss in the external validation dataset. Among the five evaluated ML models, the random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.856, 95% confidence interval: 0.854-0.859) and F1 score (0.726, 95% confidence interval: 0.722-0.730). In the external validation, the random forest model outperformed all ML models with an AUC of 0.874 and an F1 score of 0.741. The results of the SHAP method showed that the albumin change, BMI change, malignant ascites, NLR change, and PLR change were the most important factors in muscle loss. At the patient level, SHAP force plots demonstrated insightful interpretation of our random forest model to predict muscle loss.

conclusionsExplainable ML model was developed using clinical data to identify patients experiencing muscle loss after treatment and provide information of feature contribution. Using the SHAP method, clinicians may better understand the contributors to muscle loss and target interventions to counteract muscle loss.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalOvarian NeoplasmsAlbuminsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedAlbuminsmachine learningmuscle lossovarian cancerSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID37435785
PMCPMC10570082
OpenAlexW4383998182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.