ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023
Explainable machine learning model for predicting skeletal muscle loss during surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning for predicting muscle loss after radiotherapy using clinical and toxicity data in oral cavity cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning models to predict the recurrence of common bile duct stones after ERCP.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Enhancing healthcare explainability through multiobjective counterfactual explanations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a Machine Learning‑Based Prognostic Model for Intermediate Trophoblastic Tumors: A Single-Center Study With Web-Based Tool Implementation.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Immune Abnormalities: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Using First-Trimester Sonographic Features.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the predictors of endometrial nonbenign lesions in asymptomatic postmenopausal women via explainable machine learning.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Preoperative differentiation of borderline and malignant ovarian tumors using interpretable machine learning.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning model for identifying the risk of suboptimal oocyte maturation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing GnRH-antagonist protocol.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and related indicators with heart failure-related mortality in individuals with early-stage cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Development and interpretability of an XGBoost model to predict high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- The predictive value ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Early Identification of Endometrial Malignancy in Postmenopausal Women with Asymptomatic Endometrial Thickening: A Novel Explainable Machine Learning Model.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based risk prediction model for sepsis development in patients with multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Development and explainability of a machine learning prediction model for histological prostatic inflammation in surgically treated patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center internal validation study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning: predicting lymph node metastasis around the entrance point to the recurrent laryngeal nerve in cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Frailty prediction in heart failure patients with acute infections: the potential role of thiazide diuretics?PloS one · 2026Article
- Ferroptosis Signature Correlates with Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter validation of a machine learning model for predicting intrapartum high fever in parturients receiving labor analgesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkeletal muscle loss during treatment is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. Although changes in muscle mass can be assessed on computed tomography (CT) scans, this labour-intensive process can impair its utility in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict muscle loss based on clinical data and to interpret the ML model by applying SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.
methodsThis study included the data of 617 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy at a tertiary centre between 2010 and 2019. The cohort data were split into training and test sets based on the treatment time. External validation was performed using 140 patients from a different tertiary centre. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured from pre- and post-treatment CT scans, and a decrease in SMI ≥ 5% was defined as muscle loss. We evaluated five ML models to predict muscle loss, and their performance was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 score. The features for analysis included demographic and disease-specific characteristics and relative changes in body mass index (BMI), albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The SHAP method was applied to determine the importance of the features and interpret the ML models.
resultsThe median (inter-quartile range) age of the cohort was 52 (46-59) years. After treatment, 204 patients (33.1%) experienced muscle loss in the training and test datasets, while 44 (31.4%) patients experienced muscle loss in the external validation dataset. Among the five evaluated ML models, the random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.856, 95% confidence interval: 0.854-0.859) and F1 score (0.726, 95% confidence interval: 0.722-0.730). In the external validation, the random forest model outperformed all ML models with an AUC of 0.874 and an F1 score of 0.741. The results of the SHAP method showed that the albumin change, BMI change, malignant ascites, NLR change, and PLR change were the most important factors in muscle loss. At the patient level, SHAP force plots demonstrated insightful interpretation of our random forest model to predict muscle loss.
conclusionsExplainable ML model was developed using clinical data to identify patients experiencing muscle loss after treatment and provide information of feature contribution. Using the SHAP method, clinicians may better understand the contributors to muscle loss and target interventions to counteract muscle loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.