Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37435546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2023

Comparative toxicity assessment of glyphosate and two commercial formulations in the planarian

S Grace Fuselier, Danielle Ireland, Nicholas Fu, Christina Rabeler, Eva-Maria S Collins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  3. Rapid behavioral screening in the planarianFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Grace FuselierDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States.
Danielle IrelandDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States.
Nicholas FuDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States.
Christina RabelerDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, United States.
Swarthmore College · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

behavioral screeningecotoxicologyflatwormGBHglyphosateherbicideneurotoxicitynew approach method

Identifiers

PMID37435546
PMCPMC10332155
OpenAlexW4382022996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.