Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37435472›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2023

A toolbox for a structured risk-based prehabilitation program in major surgical oncology.

Svenja Sliwinski, Elisabeth Werneburg, Sara Fatima Faqar-Uz-Zaman, Charlotte Detemble, Julia Dreilich, Lisa Mohr, Dora Zmuc, Katharina Beyer, Wolf O Bechstein, Florian Herrle and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Svenja Sliwinski *Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Elisabeth Werneburg *Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Sara Fatima Faqar-Uz-ZamanDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Charlotte DetembleDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Julia DreilichInstitute of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Lisa MohrInstitute of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Dora ZmucDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Katharina BeyerDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Wolf O BechsteinDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Florian HerrleGerman Association for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Surgical Work Force for Perioperative Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Patrizia MalkomesDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Christoph ReissfelderGerman Association for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Surgical Work Force for Perioperative Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Joerg P RitzGerman Association for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Surgical Work Force for Perioperative Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Tim VilzGerman Association for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Surgical Work Force for Perioperative Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes FleckensteinInstitute of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Andreas A SchnitzbauerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEGerman Insurance Association · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prehabilitation is a multimodal concept to improve functional capability prior to surgery, so that the patients' resilience is strengthened to withstand any peri- and postoperative comorbidity. It covers physical activities, nutrition, and psychosocial wellbeing. The literature is heterogeneous in outcomes and definitions. In this scoping review, class 1 and 2 evidence was included to identify seven main aspects of prehabilitation for the treatment pathway: (i) risk assessment, (ii) FITT (frequency, interventions, time, type of exercise) principles of prehabilitation exercise, (iii) outcome measures, (iv) nutrition, (v) patient blood management, (vi) mental wellbeing, and (vii) economic potential. Recommendations include the risk of tumor progression due to delay of surgery. Patients undergoing prehabilitation should perceive risk assessment by structured, quantifiable, and validated tools like Risk Analysis Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiology Score, or Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group scoring. Assessments should be repeated to quantify its effects. The most common types of exercise include breathing exercises and moderate- to high-intensity interval protocols. The program should have a duration of 3-6 weeks with 3-4 exercises per week that take 30-60 min. The 6-Minute Walking Testing is a valid and resource-saving tool to assess changes in aerobic capacity. Long-term assessment should include standardized outcome measurements (overall survival, 90-day survival, Dindo-Clavien/CCI®) to monitor the potential of up to 50% less morbidity. Finally, individual cost-revenue assessment can help assess health economics, confirming the hypothetic saving of $8 for treatment for $1 spent for prehabilitation. These recommendations should serve as a toolbox to generate hypotheses, discussion, and systematic approaches to develop clinical prehabilitation standards.

Indexed as

exercisingmental wellbeingmorbiditynutritionPBMprehabilitationrisk assessment—methodssurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID37435472
PMCPMC10332323
OpenAlexW4382047922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.