ReviewNeurology. Genetics2022
Integrating Genetic Structural Variations and Whole-Genome Sequencing Into Clinical Neurology.
Review in Neurology. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Detection of antimicrobial resistance via state-of-the-art technologies versus conventional methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Scrutinizing neurodegenerative diseases: decoding the complex genetic architectures through a multi-omics lens.Human genomics · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Personalized Medicine: Synergy with Multi-Omics Data Generation, Main Hurdles, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Education and training in neurology: developments and future challenges.European journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Review
- Genetic Testing of Movements Disorders: A Review of Clinical Utility.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- A collection of read depth profiles at structural variant breakpoints.Scientific data · 2023Article
- New Mission, New Reviews, New Word Counts, Oh My!Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in genome sequencing technologies have unlocked new possibilities in identifying disease-associated and causative genetic markers, which may in turn enhance disease diagnosis and improve prognostication and management strategies. With the capability of examining genetic variations ranging from single-nucleotide mutations to large structural variants, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is an increasingly adopted approach to dissect the complex genetic architecture of neurologic diseases. There is emerging evidence for different structural variants and their roles in major neurologic and neurodevelopmental diseases. This review first describes different structural variants and their implicated roles in major neurologic and neurodevelopmental diseases, and then discusses the clinical relevance of WGS applications in neurology. Notably, WGS-based detection of structural variants has shown promising potential in enhancing diagnostic power of genetic tests in clinical settings. Ongoing WGS-based research in structural variations and quantifying mutational constraints can also yield clinical benefits by improving variant interpretation and disease diagnosis, while supporting biomarker discovery and therapeutic development. As a result, wider integration of WGS technologies into health care will likely increase diagnostic yields in difficult-to-diagnose conditions and define potential therapeutic targets or intervention points for genome-editing strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.