ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023
Patient satisfaction with follow-up after spinal fusion.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The first week matters: App-based PROM trajectories and follow-up retention after endoscopic lumbar surgery.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of initial telemedicine follow-up after spinal fusion for AIS.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative follow-up visits (PFUs) allow providers to track patient recovery but can be costly to patients. With the advent of the novel coronavirus pandemic, virtual/phone visits have been utilized as an alternative to in-person PFUs. Patients were surveyed to elucidate patient satisfaction with postoperative care in the setting of increased virtual follow-up visits. A prospective survey with retrospective cohort analysis of chart data was conducted to better understand the factors influencing patient satisfaction related to their PFUs after spine fusion with the goal of improving the value of postoperative care. Methods: Adult patients at least 1 year postoperative from cervical or lumbar fusion surgery completed a telephone survey related to their postoperative clinic experience. Medical record data including complications, number of visits and length of follow-up, and presence of phone/virtual visits were abstracted and analyzed. Results: Fifty patients (54% female) were included. Univariate analysis demonstrated no association between satisfaction and patient demographics, rates of complication, mean length or number of PFUs, or incidence of phone/virtual visits. Patients "very satisfied" with their clinic experience were more likely to be "very satisfied" with their outcome (P<0.01), and to feel their concerns were "very well addressed" (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis additionally demonstrated that satisfaction was positively associated with how well patient concerns were addressed (P<0.01) and the incidence of virtual/phone visits (P=0.01), and negatively associated with age (P=0.01) and level of education (P=0.01). Conclusions: After spinal fusion, patient satisfaction is positively related to virtual/phone visits and to how well their concerns are addressed. As long as patient concerns remain adequately addressed, surgeons can eliminate excess PFUs which are not clinically beneficial without adversely impacting patients' postoperative experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.