ArticleCureus2023
A Comparison of Checklist and Domain-Based Ratings in the Assessment of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Performance.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand viva examination.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Abdominal ultrasound performance assessment: a comparison of generic and extended OSCE rating scales.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Agreement and reliability of global rating versus checklist scores in a high-stakes undergraduate OSCE in Rwanda.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Correlation between task-based checklists and global rating scores in undergraduate objective structured clinical examinations in Saudi Arabia: a 1-year comparative study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2025Observational
- Article
- The Storm Within: Exploring First-Year Nursing Students' Experiences of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is the mainstay of clinical assessment in the final-year undergraduate Family Medicine clerkship at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC). The gold standard for OSCE assessment is the checklist rating, completed by physician examiners. Numerous studies have suggested that global or domain-based OSCE ratings may be a better indicator of competence than checklist ratings. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of domain-based OSCE ratings in the context of final-year, undergraduate, Family Medicine OSCE examinations in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is akin to an exercise in quality improvement, as we continuously look for ways to improve our OSCE assessment processes.
methodsThis study utilised a quantitative methodology. Three final year OSCE exams were chosen. Physicians rated each student using a checklist score and using a more holistic domain-based score. Physician checklist scores and physician domain-based scores were then compared, and correlation was assessed. We also looked at the internal consistency of the scoring methods.
resultsA significant correlation was found between checklist and domain-based scores by physicians for all exams (r=0.858, p<0.01), with a good internal consistency for these methodologies for all exams.
conclusionThe results demonstrate that both checklist and domain-based scores offer some benefit to the assessment, with a similar internal consistency and strong correlation. Domain-based ratings should be utilised for softer skills that are not easily assessed by checklists. There is clearly a need to rethink our OSCE assessment. The assessment should combine checklist and domain-based physician scores. As trainees become more experienced, checklist OSCE may penalise directness and efficiency, while domain-based ratings would offer a better appraisal of competence, and have been shown to be more sensitive to the level of training and expertise. Changing the assessment methods will lead to necessary changes in the student approach to the OSCE and improve authenticity and validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.